Article Summary - New Investigation from Malaysia Airlines

Dutch investigators strike blow against Russian fact free politics brought BUK

After Malaysia airlines shutting down by Russian missile on 17 July 2014, 298 people were killed in such incident. While Russia media reported that it was caused by Ukrainian rocket who actually wanted to shot Putin's plane, the Dutch-led Joint Investigation team argued the airline felt due to BUK warhead utilizing by the Russian army. Albeit, it was assumed as speculation and there was no abundant evidence.

Source: economist

Lincoln, I am sure that this is too short for an article summary. You are suggested to write more than 4-5 sentences in a paragraph. It would be approximately consist of 100 words minimum.

Aside from grammatical feedback, I would say that the content of your summary seems a bit jumpy. After stating that this happened either because of Ukranian rocket or Russian army warhead, you just directly jumped to the fact that this is only a speculation due to lack of evidence. I reckon that you need to explain why they eventually say that this is a speculation while they claim that this is a new investigation. You need to underline that investigation is far more different than speculation. How can a new investigation jumped to speculation? This is what you need to explore.