Video records are a better way to learn about the way other people in the world live

Thanks to advancements in technology, people can easily access knowledge from around the world through camera tools. Some argue that video records are more effective for learning about the world compared to reading written documents. However, I believe that written documents still play a valuable role in education.

On one hand, videos have several merits. Firstly, watching videos provides a sense of realism and vibrant colors in every moment. Additionally, video records can capture stunning moments that are difficult to describe in words. Moreover, videos are often more engaging than prose for many viewers, as they offer visual and auditory stimulation. For example, while the traditional method of learning history involves reading books and documents, combining this with watching historical documentaries on platforms like YouTube can make students feel more engaged and better remember the content.

On the other hand, written documents such as books, magazines, and newspapers remain valuable resources for learning. Firstly, researchers have found that reading documents helps people retain lessons in their long-term memory and improves concentration. Furthermore, in some underdeveloped countries, access to internet technologies may be limited, hindering learning through videos. Moreover, books are considered more reliable sources of information compared to video records because their content undergoes verification before publication and is subject to more rigorous censorship than videos on social media.

In conclusion, while videos can be effective learning tools, printed materials continue to serve an important role in education. Both forms of media have their own strengths and weaknesses, and the choice between them may depend on individual preferences and circumstances.

The writer's opinion is incorrect. The question to be responded to is based upon the premise of "To what extent do you agree or disagree?" The discussion does not focus on education alone either. So the writer created a prompt deviation that will cost him a passing score in the essay. This particular paragraph will immediately receive a failing score due to the changes the writer made to the original discussion topic and points. As such, he will gain minimal points overall for the discussion as points need to be awarded regardless of the irrelevance of the response. However, there is a limitation to the scores that can be awarded. He cannot receive a passing score in any section because of the irrelevance of the response. So the essay will receive a failing score.