TOPIC: some people think that younger people are not suitable for important positions in government of countries. Other argue that younger people have new ideas in these positions. Discuss that advantages and disadvantages for that.
Will you vote for a 30-year-old young man to be the mayor in your city? Perhaps in this occasion, it is not easy for you to make a decision. Via this essay, I aim to help you with some analyses of the benefits as well as the drawbacks on this issue.
From my perspective, it is the truth that the young can bring a great number of new ideas and change to the development of our society. The governments of China, for instance, stimulate graduates as officers to contribute themselves to the construction of the countryside. To our joy, most of the country areas have put on new looks thanks to the performance of these young people. What's more, as the new generations are better educated, they are capable to deal with a majority of problems with specialized knowledge of diverse aspect. If an elder officer is assigned to design a reasonable setting of the traffic lights, he or she may have to conduct lots of experiments. However, a younger qualified man can accomplish this task using statistics in just a few days. From these two points, it is appropriate to appoint younger people to take some important positions in the government.
In contrast, we have to take a view of another side of the coin. Initially, since young men are always the freshmen in politics, they are in fact lacking experience. When the economic crisis comes, we cannot expect these 'babies' to save the world of commerce successfully. Also, younger people are less patient and circumspect than elder people when facing a position to reach a conclusion. In case that they determine to execute their commands hastily, there may be a catastrophe to the whole nation.
As far as I am concerned, there are certainly young talents that are suitable for certain positions of the government. Nonetheless, we should consider more cautiously with strict tests when choosing new members of the government.
Will you vote for a 30-year-old young man to be the mayor in your city? Perhaps in this occasion, it is not easy for you to make a decision. Via this essay, I aim to help you with some analyses of the benefits as well as the drawbacks on this issue.
From my perspective, it is the truth that the young can bring a great number of new ideas and change to the development of our society. The governments of China, for instance, stimulate graduates as officers to contribute themselves to the construction of the countryside. To our joy, most of the country areas have put on new looks thanks to the performance of these young people. What's more, as the new generations are better educated, they are capable to deal with a majority of problems with specialized knowledge of diverse aspect. If an elder officer is assigned to design a reasonable setting of the traffic lights, he or she may have to conduct lots of experiments. However, a younger qualified man can accomplish this task using statistics in just a few days. From these two points, it is appropriate to appoint younger people to take some important positions in the government.
In contrast, we have to take a view of another side of the coin. Initially, since young men are always the freshmen in politics, they are in fact lacking experience. When the economic crisis comes, we cannot expect these 'babies' to save the world of commerce successfully. Also, younger people are less patient and circumspect than elder people when facing a position to reach a conclusion. In case that they determine to execute their commands hastily, there may be a catastrophe to the whole nation.
As far as I am concerned, there are certainly young talents that are suitable for certain positions of the government. Nonetheless, we should consider more cautiously with strict tests when choosing new members of the government.
