Writing Feedback / Ielts task 2 - the aim of university education [4]

After high school, all most people have been tried to go to universities with a hope that it will bring them a better career in the future. While they belive intensely that ensurance of job opportunities is the only benefit, others suppose each individuals and society gain considerable benefits from attaining university education. In this essay, i will ague both side of this issue.

It cannot deny that people who have university degree have better jobs and higher living standard than others who have not. The majority people want to develop future career prospects and attending university is the best choice because it improve personal working skills and atractiveness to potential employers. In addition, university education give you a solid foundation knowledge which will help you increase specialized skills and easily learn new technical knowledge in the future. For example,I work for an advertising company as marketing researcher and thank to what i learned at banking university, i get up with new knowledge so fast.

However, there are much wider benefits of having university degree for both individuals and society must be counted subsequent. First, people who study in university have better social skills and more confident cause of living away from home. A case in point is that many students have move to hostel and meeting new friends. As a result, their maturity and confidence will grow enabling them to live more fullfilling lives. Second, social will gain from the contribution that the graduates can make to the economy. Educated labour certainly have higher efficency and create hude value for the social. Besides,we are living in a competitive world, so countries need well-informed people in order to compete and develop.

In brief, in spite of getting brilliant careers in the future is the major profit of university education, I am strongly agree that both individuals and social gain a lot benefits from this action. If we encourage the number of university attendances, we will improve the future of individuals and social.

Writing Feedback / IELTS TASK 2 - text messages, twittering, emails are destroying our ability to spell and write [3]

Some people say that text messages, twittering and emails are an accepted part of the language we us ein our everyday lives. Others say that they are destroying our ability to spell and write properly.

(Discuss both views and give your own opinion)

Since text SMS, twittering, emails is indispensable to morden life, some people say these tools become apart of nowaday communication language. Others think they jeopardize the language standards. In this essay, I will examine both sides of this issue.

People who critize using text sms, twittering, emails belive that they are ruined our ability to spell and write properly. The first disadvantage of using modern contact ways is cannot show the tone of voice and the truly mood of communicators. Hence, this hobbly lead to inadequate eloquence of students,inefficient ability to use words approximately in context. These methods, sencond, are replaced verbal and writing ones. Due to the fact that people spend all most time on internet social network, meetings in person and handwritten letters are uncommon. Limitation of text message is the third inconvenience of digital communication.It is messages are limited only 160 characters that is the reason for using symboys and abbrevitations to save space and time. So, as a result of typing text messages as frequently, students have poor punctuation, grammar and abbrevitation in exams and papers.

Others say digitalized communications are conventional branch of our language. Firstly, writing is more concise. It twitter's 140 characters limit that pushes us to get the effort to express( essence of) what we are trying to say. Who says you must have full sentences or paragraphs of text to make an impact or to driver people to action? Secondly, abbrevitations and symboys has had been used ever since English began written down, social networks just creat new morden words and help to communicate more effectively. Word such as exams, fridge, vet, bus are familiar today but they were new words in previous decade. When some of these abbretated forms first came into use, they also attract criticism. Thirdly, the use of initial letters for whole words ( gf for girl friends) is not at all new. People hava been innitialising common phrase for ages, such as IOU from 1618. There is no diffirence bettwen a morden child's "LOL" and an earlier generation's "Swalk" ( sealed with a loving kiss).

Finally, in my opinion, whether communication in digital era brings some bad effect on our language, it plays an important role in maintaining and developing our English. It show a human ability to be lingustically creative and adapt language to suit with diffirent demands. And in texting we are seeing is language in evolution.

Graduate / IELTS TASK 2 -Exploiting or giving animals same rights as human [2]

A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research.

Discuss both views and give your opinion

A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs. I strongly agree with the latters and my essay will discuss both sides of this issue. [ Can you help me to find an other introduction to avoid repeat the question ]

People who support animal rights suppose that utilization of animals is immoral behavior. Fist, mistreating and killing animals are ill-natured action. Despite the fact that lions, tigers, and pumas need to be live in jungles; they are imprisoned in zoos with the purpose of human's entertainment. Besides, at slaughterhouse, animals are taken blood or beat to dead. When you know that butchery, you may not want to eat meat any more. Second, why animals have no rights whiles they also have thought feelings and mind as mankind? We love ours children and we want to stay beside them, take care of them day by day. So why do we force a hen to leave her chick in order to server our diner? Human, third, should be thankful to animals instead of killing them. Let see how animals help our life to be comfortable and convenient. Sheep give us their leather to keep warm, dogs help blind people find their ways.

The others say exploitation of animals is acceptable for several reasons. I also support this view. The first benefit of these employments is providing a huge nutrient-rich food source. If we only eat vegetable, fruits and rice or bread, we may not have enough energy for a busy working-day. In addition, when people are all vegetarians, there is a serious lack of food in all over the world. Second, scientific research must be tested on animals before applied in practice. Dugs and vaccine trials contribute new effective methods of prevention and treatment. Above and beyond, without examination on bird, we may not invent airplane today. Giving equal rights to animals is the third unreasonableness. Humans is the king of all species because man is the smartest specie, others must obey human. After we grant rights to animals, the world may become chaotic.

In conclusion, also people who protect animals have their explanations; I strongly agree that killing animals for needs of food and research are ethical.