Letters / IELTS Writing Task 2: Do you think the laws are needed to make people recycle? [4]

Some People claim that not enough of the waste from home is recycles. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.

To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?

altering or adapting products for new use

In a modern society, more and more products are produced which are not able to be recycled. Discussion about whether the law is needed from government to enhance the amount of recycling since the individual practice is not enough. From my perspective, I agree the idea that government should involve and minimize the global warming caused by unrecycled goods.

The first reason is obvious, business creates hundred times of trashes every day compared to the individual. If we can have a law to enforce from business to household, the result would be more efficient and significant. Secondly, not only the trashes, the materials of products which business provides to customers are also related to the environment. For example, many drinks or milk shops offer plastic bags to customers for free that increase lots of wasted bags that only for one-time usage. If we implement the law to ban the free plastic bags or encouraging shops to use paper bags, it can save lots of unnecessary waste.

Even more, law can help not only individual or business but also the whole society can aware of it and improve all together. From the news on television, advertisements around the streets and educations from schools, families, business, more and more people can practice, implement the recycling as their daily routine.

In conclusion, I agree it's not enough for only the household or individual to do the recycling of wastes, adding the help from government to make it a legal requirement will definitely create a bigger impact to the world.

Writing Feedback / IELTS Writing Task 2: Importance of Economics or Other Type of Progess [2]

Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal. Some people, however, think that other type of progress are equally important for a country.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

an impact of progression

Economic growth is one of the key elements for a country which are agreed by many governments. Nevertheless, there are few more necessary factors that are affecting a country, including the progress of environment, health, wellness and public transportation infrastructure. I'll elaborate more in the following paragraph.

The increasing economy help business grows and creates more job opportunities, it also triggers the international trades by a globalizing world. For instance, Gogoro was a domestic company in Taiwan at first. By introducing the first mass production electronic motorcycles and receiving the assistance from the government, it becomes the leading corporation in this area, heading to the international markets like Howland and providing a hundred of employment contracts. Besides the economic growth, the living cost is gradually increasing. Government is responsible to solve the problems.

On the other hand, others types of progress are also important for a country. Firstly, the protection of the environment is urgently required. Along with the rising economy, more and more pollutions were caused by industrial activities. The recent air pollution is one of the most severest issue we are facing. Secondly, health and wellness programs are not much organised and completed. In many countries, elderly retirement and beneficial mechanism are waiting to have further discussion. Lastly, the maintenance and new construction of public transportation is one of the indispensable elements. Following the climbing populations and various ways of trade, the basic and advanced distribution methods need to be kept improving.

To sum up, I agree the economic progress is one of the essential elements for a country. However, environment, health, wellness and transportation are also the key factors which impact an overall progression of a country.

Writing Feedback / IELTS Writing Task 2: Opinions of the Constructing New or Existing Transportation [3]

public transport optimization

In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Other believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Regarding the discussion of the money should be spent on establishing the new high speed rail train or making the existing public transport better, there are few pros and cons on the both sides. From my point of view, I support to build the new train system.

Following the growing population and globalizing world, the transportation plays a significant role to address the trend. The new high speed rail system is the key way to solve the increasing demand, as well as to improve the existing shortage of current transportation.

For instance, in my hometown Taiwan, we did have various transports, like train, buses and MRT and so on. After we constructed the high speed rail train, it provides one more supply of transports and helps the different group of travellers, businessmen and citizens to have more choices and save more times.

In conclusion, it is necessary to keep optimize the existing public transport which I believe is a long term plan. However, the fastest and the most efficient way is to construct the high speed rail train beforehand.