Undergraduate /
COMMON APP ESSAY FOR DARTMOUTH, UPENN, NORTHWESTERN AND OTHER SCHOOLS [37]
Thank god, I thought I was being too harsh.
So basically, I love philosophical essays but I'm just picky. now a few clarifications:
1. I think your overall structure is GREAT. There's a real sense of evolution and thought here
2. You are playing with some very interesting ideas and you definitely have a fairly unique view of things.
BUT
Your essay just needs some more development. Let me just sketch out what I see is the main narrative thrust
1. You find "light" in subeject (I like this idea, keep it)
2. BUT science doesn't have that light - give an example of what you mean. did you feel science was too abstract, too pointless, too structured? And then say how you felt - probably not hapless but maybe frustrated or bored even with science
2. Research --> Real science --> Sense of power
3. BUT it didn't work as planned --> Data didn't make sense
4. A paradigm shift - this is IMPORTANT. I get the sense of what happened but you need to really hit this one out of the park. So go back to basics and just write in plain language what the change was, then gussy it up
5. This new paradigm will guide you - Is this really naivete?
So basically I think 1,4,5 need to be fleshed out. Just what I think
"The idea of
zenith was superficial, we create the
apex in science, not the
subject, but the calming presence told me all I needed."
Zenith/Apex vs subject - What's the relationship?