Speeches /
The King Hit- Oral presentation [4]
I have continued...
Firstly, I want to talk aboutwish to discuss how tougherstricter legislations may seem like great plan but won'twill not work in action. Proposed, stricterTougher legislations will mean that those found guilty of throwing the 'King Hit' will have a minimum sentence of eight years in prison. Also,and those found guilty of alcohol-fuelled assaults will have minimum penalties increased by two years. The reason why we have prison is for three main purposes:
2. To rehabilitate those in prison, so they become law-abiding citizens.
3. To deter those people maywho consider breaking the Law, and prevent them from actually committing the crime.
By suppodedly increasing the minimum prison sentence it is hoping to employ the third reason for prisonsin an effort to lower crime , deterring people from committing crime. By implementing this theywe are hoping that a highly intoxicated youth is expectinggoing to remember the time they will spend in prison for the punch they are mindlessly about to throw. Wait a second, how is that supposed to work? The man who killed Nicholas was so drunk that they found him a couple of blocks down the road asleep in his own vomit; not remembering throwing the punch. In such as state,How is hecan we expectedhim to think about the possible jail time he will spend for punching someone?
They will punish themselves for their action every day.Everyday, they will be with the guilt of their actions; there will be no need for punishment The chance of them repeating the attackpossibility of them committing a similar crime is highly unlikely, you would never make the same mistake twice. Just to re-cap,Hence, although tougher legislations may look likeseem like a possible method of prevention although, it would only punish those who already punish themselves. We need prevention, as; prevention is always better than a cure.
Secondly, let me talk aboutelaborate on another suggestion proposed;: increasing police presence on our streets. When Mary called the police, to report the fight in the pub arrived they arrived in under a few minuets, but still we are calling for prevention not a cure.It is clear that the response was very efficient,some people call for prevention and believe we need to stop the fight before it even starts. as people are still getting hurt or killed
Please note the use of a semi-colon, not a colon, as about to introduce something, and the subject behind is the thing you are introducing.
Be sure to clearly differentiate apart what you are trying to emphasize; your points are sometimes confused with the proposed methods, making it seem as though you actually support them.
I strongly believe that by educating today's youth we can change the disgusting drinking culture, into a completely new and safe one, where we do not fear whether our teens come home at night, or not.
Exaggerating your deep personal attachment to the issue.
In closingIn summation, teen alcohol-fuelled violence is a problem that affects all those in its wake. Many families have been left with no son, brother, husband or friend. The community haveSociety has been motivated to change this, but none have come up with an affective solution. An increase in time spent in jail will not help meet our aim, and not prevent teens from throwing the punch in the first place, which is our aim. A larger police presence of police is unreasonable due to the vast amount of money needed to see it fulfilled. Let's dare tous listen to our teens and see that they have great ideas. By educating children from a young age, they will learn that being drunk isn't cool and live by this principle through their entire lives, hopefully teaching others this principle as well. My Mary has decided to become an ambassador for FARE (Foundation for Alcohol Research and Education) she hopes to be able to teach young children about alcohol abuse. I'm very proud of Mary. Will you be proud of your child? Teach them the right way to drink and you will be helping create the change we need in society today .
Please reconsider your use of only male family members as it affects both genders, this may also increase effect on the audience.
Please note that "the community have" is grammatically incorrect; the communit(y) refers to a single body and not multiple bodies, hence the
singular indicative is used (it is referring to
one thing) //the community has//
I would like to remind you that the use of the phrase "let's dare" is not exactly appropriate in this scenario, although it may have been incorporated to sarcastically show that your idea is effective and simple, its use still suggests that is is not very proper and has been unfinished; I hope my suggestion clearly eradicates the sarcasm and makes your piece more emotionally touching.
I have not had an abundance of time to evaluate the entire speech comprehensively, but I hope that my alternations assist you, should you choose to adapt them.
I hope this helps: I am only in year 9...haha. And good luck!