Writing Feedback / Differences in the universal trend in using water for 3 distinct purposes over a period of 100 years [3]

Writing task 1 - Global water use by sector

Q: The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant.

The graph reveals differences in the universal trend in using water for 3 distinct purposes over a period of one hundred years, while the table shows different water consumption of Brazil and Congo in the year 2000.

It is obvious that the global use of water in all three sector grew steadily, especially in agriculture. Additionally, in 2000, Brazil had a greater size of population, irrigated area and individual water consumption tha Congo.

As can be seen from the graph, in the beginning year 1900, water was used most by the world for agricultural activities with approximately 5000 km3, whereas in the other sectors, including industry and domesticity, the figures were very comparatively low. Their usage increased gradually and became more dramatically since 1950. At the end of the period, in 2000, the world consumed up to 3000 km3 water for farming tasks, which was over twice as much as in industrial use. Household activities accounted for the lowest volume of water used, at about 4000 km3.

In addition, tha data given shows Brazil utilized much water than Democratic Republic of Congo. There was a population of 176 million in Brazil, compared to only 5.2 million in Congo in 2000. Besides, this country had up to 26500 km2 of farming land, which was 256 times greater than Congo. Also, their personal use of water was noticeably higher than Congo as it reached up to 359 m3, while in the other country only 8 m3 was consumed by every individual.

If possible, please give me an estimated band score. Thanks so much.
Click to see the image more clearly.

• 
  6a0120a5bb05d8970c01.png
  

Writing Feedback / I strongly support the idea of charging the foreign tourists higher [3]

Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions?

In terms of the tourism business, there are certainly some differences between foreign visitors and local visitors, including the charge of attending cultural and historical attractions. As serving foreigners in these places has distinct difficulties at many aspects, such as culture barrier or security issue, therefore, in my opinion, a higher price for them is totally comprehensive in this case.

To begin with, having foreigners in these destinations maybe not suitable as cultural features from both sides are not matched. Besides, visitors from other countries hardly know about the history or traditions of the place they visit as they come merely on entertaining purpose. Thus, this may cause some misunderstandings in the origin, structure and meaning of the heritages because visitors find it hard to accept what go against with their original thoughts. This leads to difficulties for the tour staff in helping them to enjoy and appreciate the place in a proper way. In contrast, visitors who never know the site in advance may unintentionally do damage to its state, or they may not be tolerant to obey the crucial regulations, such as taking photo in the banned place or touching divine things on display, which can trigger dissatisfaction from local people. Therefore, a greater amount of fee will make them consider before deciding to give it a go or not and it will make up for their faults if any damage really happens.

In addition, ensuring their safety is also a heavy task in these types of sites. There are always historical and cultural areas that are hiding plenty of dangers and mysteries. If anything serious occurs to them, the government have to suffer from a lot of criticism and financial lost. In fact, for instance, there was a severe case foreigners were involved in a cruise accidents while travelling on a cultural trip in a South-East Asian country, which left unexpected consequences of deaths. If they could pay more, they will enjoy safer and more reliable service. This does not mean that lower prices gives poorer care, but the more you pay, the better your visit are well-prepared.

In conclusion, I strongly support the idea of charging the foreign tourists higher. However, it is not due to economic advantages but I believe that it will provide the serving staff enough finance and motivation to evaluate the quality of the place and the benefit of visitors.

Writing Feedback / Debate about whether to teach children competitiveness or create a spirit of cooperation in them [4]

Some people think that a sense of competition in children should be encouraged..discussion writing 2

there are too much debate about whether to teach children competitiveness or create a spirit of cooperation in them. in my opinion, both of these views have their advantages and disadvantages but they are equally important.

admittedly, we are living in a society like a rapid-fire race and require us-candidates- constantly compete with others. children should be informed of this soon and provoked their potentials. the most major benefit of competition is that the kids can explore enormously with their abilities to achieve the greatest results. A competitive could also be both a challenge and a motivation to keep them hard-working to attain their own goals. In fact, most top-achievers are ambitious people who are never afraid to collide with others. moreover, competitiveness is usually associated with self-confidence and maximum efforts that every child should own. however, the drawbacks of this feature are seriously considered, as people claim that it may lead to jealousy ans obssession with decrepancy between children and their friends.

on the other hand, collaboration is variously beneficial to children. it teaches them to ultilize individual advantages to create the most powerful union to reach the goal in the easiest way. besides, working with others teaches them more that hoe to elevate themselves as children will also learn to help people and socialize their ego with the whole community. an open mind of mixing with others is a characteristic needed for a devoted and helpful person. in fact, schools always set examples of cooperation for students to witness with teamwork.. however, the habit of having supports from outside may hammer children' independence in some certain cases, such as doing their own assignments. Furthermore, it is not good for them to stay in a crowed without trying to mark their own trace. they need a race to show theirs inner force and that is they hardly have when they are together.

in brief, there are voluminous things to educate a child, including competitiveness and collaboration. having their pros and cons going hand in hand, we should encourage both two personalities in kids so that they will be growning helpful and successful.