Some people believe that only pupils of similar interests should be given admissions in schools.Others are of the opinions that schools should be open to all children with varied interests. How far you agree or disagree with the above views. Give your opinion in not less than 250 words.
There are different perspective regarding how pupils should be grouped, from one side, some people believe that we should clasify students based on their level of interets and skills,while on the other side some people support that idea to mix all children with different interests.According to me, i believe both tactics have positive and negative faces.
First of all, grouping students with alike interests will accelerate to sharpen their skills as they are in tough competetive environment,
further more such way will filter and reveal the most talent people, however, no one can deny the benefits of such talent people and how the good impact will be gained on the future.
But, looking at the picture from another nook shows some other drawbacks to this opinion, while we creating leaders, scientist and athlets, we are leaving so many students in the deep hole and just because there are normal, undoubtedly, these normal or even below the average students will improve their abilities and capabilities by exchange the knowledge and behaviour with better once
such this system enhance the sharing and caring concepts beteen pupils which a huge value by itself.
in short, i believe open schools will be more effective on long period moreover it is very integrited with humanity traits that we all need.
There are different perspective regarding how pupils should be grouped, from one side, some people believe that we should clasify students based on their level of interets and skills,while on the other side some people support that idea to mix all children with different interests.According to me, i believe both tactics have positive and negative faces.
First of all, grouping students with alike interests will accelerate to sharpen their skills as they are in tough competetive environment,
further more such way will filter and reveal the most talent people, however, no one can deny the benefits of such talent people and how the good impact will be gained on the future.
But, looking at the picture from another nook shows some other drawbacks to this opinion, while we creating leaders, scientist and athlets, we are leaving so many students in the deep hole and just because there are normal, undoubtedly, these normal or even below the average students will improve their abilities and capabilities by exchange the knowledge and behaviour with better once
such this system enhance the sharing and caring concepts beteen pupils which a huge value by itself.
in short, i believe open schools will be more effective on long period moreover it is very integrited with humanity traits that we all need.