Gender and jobs relate to gender have been becoming controversial issues. Some people suggest that universities should receive the even amount of boys and girls in any subject whereas many people tend to put their ideas in contrast. In my opinion, I personally believe that educationalists should concentrate more on qualifications of students than on the balance in sexual rate.
First of all, educational qualifications would be declined if the universities attempted to balance between males and females in any subject. In fact, universities obviously have to be responsible for creating qualified students who can work effectively after graduating. In order to do this, the colleges are definitely required to enroll excellent students. If they desire to keep a balance in gender, they will be able to have to eliminate qualitative female students instead of taking in unqualified male ones, and vice versa. Therefore, expecting the same gender rate would be cause of the declination of educational standards.
In addition, each subject in the universities tends to focus on specific knowledge and after graduating students definitely have to do particular jobs. Some fields would be more suitable for men, while other ones would be done better by women. For instance, becoming a police could be more appropriate to male students. Indeed, virtually the universities obviously enroll the number of boys much more than the amount of girls because most polices require good health to work in different situations. However, this is completely opposite of Nursery Teacher. Consequently, if the colleges requested a rate of 50 percent man and 50 percent woman, this could be trigger unpredictable difficulties for graduates after leaving their schools.
In conclusion, I once again reaffirm my viewpoints that gender balance would be necessary in some areas. Nevertheless, as long as the universities solely expect to balance in gender, this is absolutely responsible for decreasing the qualifications of education as well as creating many obstacles for students. Hence, concentrating on the management of educational qualifications would be a right orientation in order to create qualitative students-the masters of nation.
First of all, educational qualifications would be declined if the universities attempted to balance between males and females in any subject. In fact, universities obviously have to be responsible for creating qualified students who can work effectively after graduating. In order to do this, the colleges are definitely required to enroll excellent students. If they desire to keep a balance in gender, they will be able to have to eliminate qualitative female students instead of taking in unqualified male ones, and vice versa. Therefore, expecting the same gender rate would be cause of the declination of educational standards.
In addition, each subject in the universities tends to focus on specific knowledge and after graduating students definitely have to do particular jobs. Some fields would be more suitable for men, while other ones would be done better by women. For instance, becoming a police could be more appropriate to male students. Indeed, virtually the universities obviously enroll the number of boys much more than the amount of girls because most polices require good health to work in different situations. However, this is completely opposite of Nursery Teacher. Consequently, if the colleges requested a rate of 50 percent man and 50 percent woman, this could be trigger unpredictable difficulties for graduates after leaving their schools.
In conclusion, I once again reaffirm my viewpoints that gender balance would be necessary in some areas. Nevertheless, as long as the universities solely expect to balance in gender, this is absolutely responsible for decreasing the qualifications of education as well as creating many obstacles for students. Hence, concentrating on the management of educational qualifications would be a right orientation in order to create qualitative students-the masters of nation.
