School curriculum which prepare students to meet the requirements of the labor market

Schools concentrate far too much on traditional subject which do not adequately prepare students

People have different views on whether conventional curriculum at school can prepare a comprehensive foundation for students to meet the working requirements in current context or not. From my perspective, I strongly agree with the statement that traditional subjects cannot help students to meet the realistic demands of modern working world.

To begin with, it is obvious that traditional curriculum lacks of practical exposure to contemporary situation. Such subjects immensely concentrate on theory such as definition and formula, which is extremely difficult for learners to absorb and put into practice. For example, students are prone to be overwhelmed by the huge amount of knowledge about authors' biography or the meaning of the composition when learning Literature. Instead of focusing on these types of subjects, school can teach various fields of studying, for example soft skills for personal interactions and cooperation. Therefore, students who are skilled at different skills will have a solid foundation for their future occupations. Moreover, the most important things in current digital era are the Internet, electronic devices, and computer. If students graduate with a shortage of excellent knowledge of these, they cannot be highly appreciated and chosen for appropriate positions in enterprises.

Another reason why I oppose the traditional subjects is that individual needs in learning cannot be completely met in competitive world. As a matter of fact, each individual has his or her own plan for future career needing different preparation. Therefore, conventional curriculum is not a good solution, and it should be customized to be suitable for certain purposes. Taking students studying arts as an instance, if they can study in-depth on specialized subjects rather than irrelevant ones, they will have more opportunities to expose to applicable skills and have tendency to be competent.

In conclusion, it seems to me that conventional curriculum has several certain disadvantages for students in preparing a comprehensive foundation and knowledge for future profession. Both authorities and institutions should take these drawbacks into consideration and adjust the curriculum to produce students ready to meet the demands of competitive working markets.

This has created an incorrect prompt restatement. There is no reference to opposing points of view in the original discussion presentation. Therefore, you should not be referencing such a situation in your rewrite. This error will cause point deductions in terms of topic restatement accuracy. HAving displayed a different meaning, your restatement will get a failing score. That is regardless of your accurate point of view response, which actually responds well to the discussion question. So the preliminary task score may be only bordering in a lightweight passing score. It is not a score that can assure a passing score by the end.

I have no problem with the way you discussed the reasoning paragraphs as these are relevant to the given subject. However, your conclusion will prove to be faulty and again, result in point deductions, which could lead to a failing score. This is the result of your offering a solution relevant to the discussion situation, which was not part of the prompt writing instructions. This is another serious prompt deviation that instead, left the essay without a relevant reverse paraphrase conclusion as required.