Writing Feedback / Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions [2]

Local visitors vs tourists from abroad

It is general accepted that overseas tourist should be charged more than local people. I agree with this statement. Tourist from overseas should collaborate and contribute more with the preservation and maintenance of local monuments.

Cultural local monuments receive an increasingly large number of visitors from different parts of the globe. The local government encourages foreign tourists to travel to our country with the aim of visit the local cultural and historical attractions. This leads to a higher level of cost, maintenance and promotions. It must therefore the necessity of increase ticket prices for foreign visitors is essential for the conservation of cultural and historical buildings. It allows that authorities can allocated more funds to conservations programs, but also creates advertising international campaigns in order to attract more foreign visitors.

Having said that local residents are benefited from the lower prices, their visit would be more grateful and enjoyable. They constantly pay taxes which are imposed by local government. If local and foreign visitors pay the same ticket prince, it will highly unfair, because cultural attractions are keeping well maintained through taxes payers over the years, but they need more funds and investment. In addition, the local communities will receive more money for the construction of school and roads.

To sum up, applying higher ticket price to overseas visitors allow government to manage more funds to meet the necessity of the local community as well as will promote and encourage more tourisms internal and external.

Writing Feedback / Famous sports athletes should earn a lot of money [2]

salary of the sports stars

Successful sports professionals can earn a great deal more money than people in other important professions. Some people think this is fully justified while others think it is unfair. Discuss both views and given your own opinion.

It is generally accepted that sports professionals receive a high annual income compared to other professionals. This may be due to the fact that athletes are constantly under higher pressure from both media and sports fans. They have to accomplishment success throughout their entire career. In my opinion, athletes should be well-paid because their or talent and efforts are justified. In this essay, I will explain this thought.

In the world today, the most popular sport is soccer where we can see sportsman sign advantageous contracts. This is because athletes are considered role model to society and individuals, they must follow certain behavioural parameters and disciplines all of the time. For instance, Christiano Ronaldo rarely attends social events with friends and his behaviour should be adequate and appropriate and his wages reflect this. Therefore persons involved in the sports industry have to maintain discipline and be under constantly training to increase his performance and talent.

On the other hand, doctors, engineers or accounters earn salary according to their qualifications, experience and labour market. They can socialize with friends and have a normal life without the pressure from fans and media throughout their career's lives. As a consequence, the remuneration from these professionals are recognised by society and individuals

To conclude from the examples and arguments given I firmly agree that athletes should earn large amount of money in accordance with their skills and efforts whereas other professions don't need high pressure from the media and fans, as a result, their wages are imposed by the labour market, experience and qualifications.

Writing Feedback / Should schools be entertaining or educating? [4]

Some people think that schools have to be more entertaining, while others think that their sole purpose is to educate. Which do you agree with? Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion.

more entertainment or sticking to the old ways of teaching?

There is a heated debate over whether schools should provide entertainment teaching standards or should only concentrate on education policy. In my opinion, schools should encourage children's development skills by using entertainment methodology. This essay will analyse both statements and use examples from my own experience to demonstrate point and prove arguments.

Firstly, traditional education system has always been under public scrutiny. There is an idea that children tend to boost faster their interpersonal skills at young age by interacting with objects and communicate with their peers. This is due to the fact that children's cognitive development is effectively being formed and modeled in that case external factors of entertainment such as play games can support and foster their mental and physical well-being. For example, my son becomes really smart by recognising objects and sounds through the iPad. Therefore, if the purpose of traditional education is only educate children, it would hardly believe that children's development skill can be adequately set up but modern entertainment techniques can revitalizes such skills.

Secondly, traditional pedagogical techniques based on students doing homework and listening teaching can be useful on occasion. A recent study from IMT indicates that schools in UK are adopting new educational techniques since 2015, the results of this study is students are prone to awake their curiosity and creativity and the desire to learn. Therefore, schools should implement new teaching methodology as a way of delivering teaching quality with the purpose of educating people.

To conclude, it is important to improve our teaching method, different teaching techniques have emerged significantly over the time. I firmly agree that school should be more embrace entertainment rather than follow old ways of teaching. In the future, new teaching methodologies will continue to emerge.