barryha2705
Jul 31, 2019
Writing Feedback / Ielts: Argument essay No need to use animals for food, clothing and medicine [4]
Hi, @hanhdth83
I have read your essay and I would like to have some comments on it.
1. You have addressed all parts of the task and presented a clear position throughout the response. Your ideas are OK and you know how to present, extend and support them with various examples. Keep up the good work!
Despite there being two paragraphs in the body, they both point at the same idea: There are better alternatives that can replace the use of animals. So you may need to work on some new ideas in order to make your essay more persuasive. Below are some links to other relevant ideas to this topic that you can refer to:
+ Animal testing: Pros and Cons: animal-testing.procon.org/
+ Should people become vegetarian?: vegetarian.procon.org/
2. As for Cohesion and Coherence, you know how to logically organise your ideas and use a range of connectors. The introduction is straightforward and covers the issue you are going to discuss. There are clear topic sentences at the beginning of each paragraph, which are well-supported by the following ones. You also have a concluding sentence at the end of each paragraph, which is a great thing to do. The content is quite convincing and you are able to lead the readers to the point you want to make.
3. With regard to grammar, you are able to flexibly use of a variety of complex structures, although there are some inaccuracies. As for lexical resource, you know how to use a sufficient range of vocabulary to express your points of view clearly. Some collocations and uncommon words are also appropriately used in your response. However, there is still room for improvement and below are some suggested alternatives and corrections to the phrases/structures used in your prompt:
'It is often argued that thanks to technological advancements and breakthroughs, there is ... in the food, ...'
'... using animals as human food source'
'Firstly, ... increasingly proven/proved to offer equal nutritional value to/ offer as much nutritional value as meat and fish.'
'...l alternatives to animal use in the clothing and ...'
==> I suggest another way to improve this sentence: 'Moreover, there have recently been innovative non-animal alternatives/more effective alternatives that exclude/does not involve the use of animals in the clothing and pharmaceutical industry.'
'With regard to manufacturing garments, instead..., a myriad range of ...'
'... to preserve than the ones/those (made) of animal skins.'
'In terms of... From a medical perspective, sophisticated and modern ...'
Hi, @hanhdth83
I have read your essay and I would like to have some comments on it.
1. You have addressed all parts of the task and presented a clear position throughout the response. Your ideas are OK and you know how to present, extend and support them with various examples. Keep up the good work!
Despite there being two paragraphs in the body, they both point at the same idea: There are better alternatives that can replace the use of animals. So you may need to work on some new ideas in order to make your essay more persuasive. Below are some links to other relevant ideas to this topic that you can refer to:
+ Animal testing: Pros and Cons: animal-testing.procon.org/
+ Should people become vegetarian?: vegetarian.procon.org/
2. As for Cohesion and Coherence, you know how to logically organise your ideas and use a range of connectors. The introduction is straightforward and covers the issue you are going to discuss. There are clear topic sentences at the beginning of each paragraph, which are well-supported by the following ones. You also have a concluding sentence at the end of each paragraph, which is a great thing to do. The content is quite convincing and you are able to lead the readers to the point you want to make.
3. With regard to grammar, you are able to flexibly use of a variety of complex structures, although there are some inaccuracies. As for lexical resource, you know how to use a sufficient range of vocabulary to express your points of view clearly. Some collocations and uncommon words are also appropriately used in your response. However, there is still room for improvement and below are some suggested alternatives and corrections to the phrases/structures used in your prompt:
'It is often argued that thanks to technological advancements and breakthroughs, there is ... in the food, ...'
'... using animals as human food source'
'Firstly, ... increasingly proven/proved to offer equal nutritional value to/ offer as much nutritional value as meat and fish.'
'...l alternatives to animal use in the clothing and ...'
==> I suggest another way to improve this sentence: 'Moreover, there have recently been innovative non-animal alternatives/more effective alternatives that exclude/does not involve the use of animals in the clothing and pharmaceutical industry.'
'With regard to manufacturing garments, instead..., a myriad range of ...'
'... to preserve than the ones/those (made) of animal skins.'
'