Writing Feedback / Single career or several careers or ways of earning money and further studying [2]

Present a written argument or case to an educated reader with no special knowledge of the following topic:

The idea of having a single career is becoming an old fashioned one.

The new fashion might be to have several careers or ways of earning money and further education will be something that continues throughout life.

Nowadays, many people think that pursuing several careers or ways of earning money and further education is better than having a single career. In my opinion, I would argue that both cases also have their own advantages and disadvantages and the most important thing are our choices.

On the one hand, having one work might be appropriate for a large number of people. Firstly, focusing on only one long-term work might help people to obtain high promotions with higher income than other. The fact is that employees or officers might improve significantly their qualifications and experiences that make their considerable advantages compared to others who do not focusing on works. Secondly, not everyone might have ability to pursuit several works or way of earning money and further education. Instead of wasting their health to do many works at the same time or further studying, they should focus on their current work and spend the free time for relaxing or taking care of their family.

On the other hand, pursuing several careers or ways of earning money or further education also bring a large amount of advantages. Firstly, through experiencing several careers, people might choose the most proper career that they feel satisfies and happiest. Secondly, by doing several works at the same time, employees might earn extra money that might be spent for their family, travelling. Thirdly, higher education might have people have a good profile that might make significant advantage when they apply for higher position in the future compared to others.

In conclusion, I would argue that having a single career or pursuing several works or ways of earning money and higher education also has their own advantages. People should carefully consider before choosing which one is most proper to them.

Writing Feedback / What factors influence decisions which news content print in newspapers and which broadcast on TV? [3]

Broadcast on TV and print in Newspapers

Topic: News editors decide what to broadcast on television and what to print in newspapers. What factors do you think influence these decision? Do we become used to bad news? Would it be better if more good news was reported?

Nowadays, the broadcasting information and news through TV or newspapers plays an important role because of the demand to update them of people. This essay would like to discuss on the factors that affect the decision of news editors to choice what to broadcast on TV and what to print in newspaper as well as the role and the effect of bad news and good news on our life.

On the one hand, the fact that there are several factors that effect on news editors' decision. Firstly, it is their qualification. People with good qualification might have the higher ability to classify what should be broadcasted on TV or newspaper as well as distinguish between fake news and reliable news than others. Another factor is their responsibilities for the works. In some cases, if news editors do not pay attention to their works, it might lead to something wrong happening that affect negatively and considerable their decisions.

On the other hand, there are debates on whether people become used to bad news because there are a large amount of bad news broadcasted every day. Besides, many point of views that it is better if more good news is reported. The fact is that the public has the right to approach reliable news and information. Not only bad news but also good news should be broadcasted quickly and reliably to viewers and readers. The updated and reliability of news, not providing more good news, will make it better. Simultaneously, the readers and viewers will choice what they want to know and becoming used to bad news or not might depends on themselves.

In conclusion, several factors affect significantly the decision of news editors as aforementioned. Bad and good news play equally important roles; becoming used to bad news or good news depends on the approaches of readers and viewers; and the updated and reliability of news plays a more important role to make our life better.

Writing Feedback / Should rich nations share their strength with others? [3]

Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations

Nowadays, there is an argument that whether wealthy countries should share their wealth to poorer countries or the poor ones should have to take care of their citizens by themselves. In my opinion, I would argue that in somewhat, rich nations should express their responsibilities to the world by sharing their helps to the poor nations; however, the poor nations also have the main responsibilities to develop their nations by themselves.

On the one hand, I agree with the argument that rich countries should help other countries by providing such things as food or education. The fact is that there are a large number of countries are still really poor. The people does not have basic living condition, even more does not have enough clean water or food as well. Living in a global and regional integration period, rich nations, rich people should not stand alone without sharing with them. Through international aid packages or charitable activities, wealth nations might help the poor nations, poor people to lift out poverty. For instance, after the Vietnam war, vietnam is one of the poorest country in South East Asia, however thanks to international aid packages as well as the rich nations' helps, nowadays, Vietnam is becoming a developing country, the citizens have a good life and enjoy the life.

On the other hand, I would argue that poor countries should take care of themselves first. Firstly, the governments voted by their citizens are representation of the country and paid by the citizens' taxes. Therefore, the governments not others have to have main responsibilities for their citizens. Secondly, the fact is that, there is no country that helps other does not ask any incentives from the host country. For example, wealth nations might help other by investing heavy into the poor country through opening big companies. They might generate a large number of job opportunities for local people, however, they also might lead to over-exploiting of resources, or environment pollution that their later generations have to face in the future.

In conclusion, I would like to argue that rich nations should share their strength with others, besides, poor nations also need to look after their citizen themselves.