Book Reports /
Argumentative essay on 1984 - Outline [40]
Altruistic behavior lights up the pleasure centers in the brain. And, indeed, feels good.
If that were the whole story, there would be no war, no violence, etc. However, watching people fight to the death, for instance, also lights up pleasure centers somewhere in our brains, or the coliseum would never have caught on. So clearly, the statement, stated in the context of this particular conversation, is misleading. In fact, I would say that our behavior shows that altruism clearly isn't as important to us as food or sex. If a neurological study purports to show otherwise, then it is wrong, the same way the mathematical proof that bumblebees couldn't fly had to be wrong.
Besides, these sorts of studies are always sort of suspect. All the study may have proved is that the sort of people who volunteer to take part in scientific studies enjoy being altruistic, which would hardly be unexpected. Or that people get pleasure from doing what they believe they are supposed to be doing, which, from socializing forces, or merely from being in a study that tests for altruism, is being altruistic. For that matter, as the study in question involved asking people to imagine giving away large sums of money rather than keeping it for themselves, it may be that the brain recognized largess as a good way to win either food or sex. In other words, the people may have recognized on an intuitive level that giving the money away was more likely to impress members of the opposite sex than hoarding it. Really, there are dozens of possible interpretations of the data, and nothing in the study to support the conclusion the scientists draw from it, which seem to be little more than wishful thinking on the part of the scientists.
Finally, as I pointed out, just because something feels good doesn't mean we should do it.
So, you have a highly suspect statement, that clearly doesn't support all the implications you would like it to even if it were true, and whose truth has no real impact on the discussion at hand.