Research Papers /
Research paper on scientific research [9]
The animal testing was just random filler text to make it appear as if the essay had any merit.
And now you have learned the hazards of throwing filler into essays! It tends to make matters worse rather than better.
In reality, the essay is an utter disaster, and I gave up on my original concept
As with 12 step programs, admitting that the essay is a disaster is the first step.
But, please tell us: What
was your original concept? Maybe there's a way to make that workable rather than start from scratch.
"If you want to critique the U.S. for being hostile to science, there are plenty of reasons to do so."
During the Bush administration, scientists of all sorts at federal agencies were prohibited from releasing findings that contradicted what the administration wished were true. Some were prohibited from speaking to the public. One of the top climate scientists at NASA has spoken out about this, as have several other lower-level scientists.
All over the United States, science education is under assault from those who fear any science content that in any way demonstrates or flows from the fact of evolution. In many school districts students are taught Creationism -- oops, "intelligent design" -- alongside evolution in
science classrooms in
public schools. As a result, a pitifully small percentage of U.S. citizens accept evolution as fact.
Scientific illiteracy among the citizenry of a democracy in the era of technology = uninformed and ill-advised government (in)actions.
Some scientists who want to do stem cell research complain that even Obama's loosening of the regulations on that research still leaves them unable to do the work they believe needs doing.
I read the UK magazine
New Scientist regularly, and much of what I am saying here comes from my (admittedly rough) recollection of what I have read there. Many
New Scientist articles are online in free full text, so you might want to start there.