Writing Feedback / Fashion is one of ways to assess a person's ability, including in a business world. Dressing smartly [2]

Q: Some organizations believe that their employees should dress smartly. Others value quality of work above appearance.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Fashion is one of the ways to assess a person's ability, including in a business world. In fact, numerous employees are encouraged by some occupations to wear the best clothes. Meanwhile, the others consider that work quality is more crucial than an appearance which is shown by it. I personally believe that the fashion does not guarantee the occupant's capability.

According to my opinion, the good style becomes something, regarded in several public jobs which require meeting with societies. It is because formal and polite situation is displayed by wearing 'blazer or coat'. To illustrate this, Public Relations (PR) have to meet the new client with better appearance. Afterwards, the PR can easily be believed to present their companies plan to cooperate in the business. Finally, the clients will accept the PR companies' plan to join together and the PR succeed doing their jobs. However, the good fashion can support their jobs, I believe that it does not occur in all sectors.

In some cases, this condition is not required towards several careers since many jobs merely need certain abilities of their employees. For instance, engineers in the industries who have to manage numerous machines are not valued by the companies based on their latest style. Consequently, it proves that their skills to operate these devices are more essential than the impressive style. I strongly believe, for several vocations fashion is not reckoned as the main reason to hire people.

To sum up, it is evident that fashion does not guarantee the employee's ability. I think, it is better for people to adapt their styles appropriate with the occupations which they have.

Writing Feedback / Fashion is one of the ways to assess someone's habit. (IELTS Task 2) [2]

Q: Some people say that the clothes people wear are the most important indication of what they are like. Others, however, say that people should not be judged by the clothes they wear.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Fashion is one of the ways to assess someone's habit. In fact, numerous people value a person through style which they choose. Others consider that this cannot be turned as the measure to know human's interest. I personally believe that first appearance cannot be used as a judgment as the wise statement, 'don't judge book by the cover'.

In fact, wider society has habituated judge about human' beings hobby and personality based on their fashion. It is because everybody tends using something appropriate with their habituation. Research from Fletcher conducts that some persons will illustrate their selves regarded interests, such as wearing jeans, jackets, and t-shirts every day indicating that they are casual and like something that is free. Consequently, this value can be used towards several people, daily using the same clothes. However, this not be applied to all conditions.

In some cases, the first appearance does not be used as the judgment because in several circumstances; people will change their fashion directly. To illustrate this, in the same research, Fletcher also proves that everybody can try to change their style as effort to adapt towards different situation. Finally, the assessment is not done in all matters. I strongly believe that the value about someone's life cannot be applied in all times.

To sum up, it is evident that the appearance cannot explain someone's interest. In this case every human should not merely judge person based on their fashion.

Writing Feedback / It is very troublesome for people to have a healthy lifestyle in the modern era. (IELTS Task 2) [2]

Q: Some people say that in the modern world it is very difficult for people to have a healthy lifestyle. Others, however, say that it is easy for people to be healthy and fit if they want to be.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Obesity becomes the huge problem worldwide which is caused by the consumption of fast food excessively and the lack of exercise. In this case, people argue that a healthy lifestyle becomes something which is difficult to be applied every day, while others think that it is easy when the general public want to choose it. I personally believe that being healthy is a choice for human beings because there are many ways to keep fit, and it depends on the individual.

Commonly, full activities force many people, especially workers, to leave patterns to be healthy through the routine exercise and consumption of healthy meal. It is because they do not have enough time to cook the healthy food or go to a gym. For instance, the workers in Sudirman street Jakarta, Indonesia, tend to consume a fried chicken provided MC-Donald and KFC as the solution to reduce time. Finally, they have the risk much more to be detected in hearth disease and it is added by avoiding to do exercise on the week end. However, there are several people who can merely keep the pattern of healthy lifestyle.

In fact, many employees can keep their healthy though they are really busy as the officers since they manage the schedule very well to do sport activity 30 minutes per week and choose the high nutrient cuisine. To illustrate this, Megawati, officers in Kuningan city, Jakarta, provides the food before go to the office every day and does an aerobic on Friday night. Finally, she can merely healthy and it proves that everybody can be healthy if they want.

To sum up, it is evident that every human kind can be healthy person when they can manage their time. Everybody should consider the healthy lifestyle and maintain the schedule to cook nutrient food and do routine exercise.

Writing Feedback / It's evident that electronic devices influence the communication between societies when used wrongly [2]

Q: The use of electronic media has a negative effect on personal relationships between people.
To what extent do you agree and disagree?

Nowadays, the advance of technology often influences communication and interaction among people. In fact, numerous people argue that electronic media, such as a television, computer and mobile phone, bring negative impact on the relationships. I personally agree with this statement since the relation of society is more and more disturbed when they use this device without controlling.

In fact, many people often forget their real family and friends when they use the information device. It is because this tool addicts them to leave their lives to still focus on the fictive activities on the screen of the television or computer. For instance, the mothers, who watch serial drama, waste their time only in front of television and bury their obligation to entrust their children. Consequently, they will lose their role as parents to educate their children. However, it is true that the use of technological device affects the communication among people who cannot control their selves.

In addition, using gadget, computer and hand phone, does not influence the interaction among human beings since they merely communicate with their family and relatives. To illustrate this, my father has good relation with his daughter though using computer every day as the journalist. It proves that this solitary impacts to several citizens, instead of all societies. I believe that the drawback occurs towards people who do not know the real function of electronic media to ease human's work.

To sum up, it is evident that electronic device influences the communication between societies when it is used worse. I think that everybody should take an advantage of the electronic effectively and smartly.

Writing Feedback / It is evident that the business has to search the profit to maintain the production and pay a salary [2]

Q: The purpose of business is to make money and they should concentrate only on this.
Do you agree or disagree?

In this globalization era, everyone can be a part of the market or business world. In fact, many people argue that the main motivation for starting a business is merely money, and entrepreneurs shall only focus on it. I personally believe that the companies should back to the main purpose to gain profit and consider their role to help the society's life.

To begin, Money is the aim of the private business. It is because the business has to defend continuous their company and hires the employees. Mayora, for example, has a large capital, which successfully hires thousands of workers due to defending the first purpose to gain maximum profit. Finally, this company can help the economic stabilization in this country. However, the huge company has the responsibility to help the societies.

Moreover, huge businesses have responsibility to support the local government to build the infrastructure near their factories. It is because the local societies take the important role to provide the natural and human resources for them. Cevron company, for instance, contributes to the construction of the main street for Sukabumi people, in West Java. They also provide scholarship to the surround children on the area of mount Salak. Finally, the good sustainability will occur between the dwellers and company. There is no doubt that the financial aid from great business is needed to supporting administration program.

To sum up, it is evident that the business has to search the profit to maintain the production and pay a salary. Hence, it can also help the general public through the construction of infrastructure except the payment of tax.