Writing Feedback / Some people concede that life was superior in major avenues 100 years ago. [4]

Question: Life now is better than it was 100 years ago.

My Answer:

Undergoing a span of a century the Earth witnessed both ameliorations and slight pitfalls. However, some people concede that life was superior in major avenues 100 years ago. According to my perspective, I stiffly concur with the statement provided and this essay would support this.

First and foremost, the way individuals live has sizeable privileges compared to it used to be a century ago. Of these privileges, the role captured by technological advancements is immense. Prevailingly, contemporary specimens of machinery have boosted our daily lives and triggered them to be prompt and efficient. People now communicate with their loved ones who are in faraway places at the push of a button or visit them in a fraction of a day. Further and even more significantly, due to an enormous medical mushroom, a great deal of fatal disorders have been being eliminated. As a result, many people's lives are saved. Looked from this perception, life is far better it was a century ago.

On the other hand, however, people now in a social breakdown. Whereas, they used to have a strong family bond and loyalty towards each other which is now gradually disappearing. The problem of the globe - increased divorce rate is wreaking havoc to young children (because of insufficient nurturing by a single parent). The abovementioned enhancement in technology, meanwhile, is also inflicting minor challenges. Since people are over relied on those gizmos, such as social networking, they tend to prefer "imaginary" relationship with others. As a ramification, the sense of face-to-face contact is now in depletion.

To take all mentioned into a nutshell I would like to once again reaffirm my position that in general, life is reasonably better than it was a century ago. Current pitfalls are imperceptible beyond tremendous scale of today's privileges.

Please, give approximate band scores for this.

Writing Feedback / When a country develops its technology, the traditional skills and ways of life die out. It is point [3]

Question: When a country develops its technology, the traditional skills and ways of life die out. It is pointless to try and keep them alive.

To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

My Answer:

There is an inexorable prosperity of technology exploitation in certain countries. Having mentioned that, countries of this kind encounter disappearance of traditional skills or avenues of life whilst there is no use of their maintenance. According to my perspective, I stiffly concur with the given statement and this essay would provide support on this.

Initial years of prevailing century has been an immense landmark for emergence of widespread technology use in vast majority of countries. Not surprisingly, this transition is inevitably correlated with sizeable benefits for a life of a human race. Today, individuals have been revamping their working conditions through embodying help from contemporary technologies that are financially affordable and functioning promptly. To exemplify, supermarkets throughout the world utilize specified devices that operate immeasurably efficient by means of calculating and receiving the payment from customers. Particularly this development is undoubtedly time-friendly and is not labor-intensive.

Nonetheless, the role of traditional skills is a matter of great essence in social life. Plainly, it appears that intensive use of technology might inflict somewhat stress among individuals. People tend to have a converse with each other in order to garner new experience and knowledge or to master undeveloped skills. Furthermore, it is most likely that the elderly part of a society would gainsay with the involvement of modern technology and advocate the maintenance of traditional methods.

By way of conclusion, it is irrefutable that there might be several number of challenges of losing traditional skills. However, in general, the privileges of contemporary technologies highly outweigh over those, generated by outdated skills.

Writing Feedback / Tourism is an excellent way to develop a country, but it can also cause harm. How can countries ensu [3]

Tourism is one of the key aspects that bring an intense progression to a particular country. However, there has been a thought-arising debate whether this industry poses somewhat hazards. In this essay I would cite my position on this whilst indicate some feasible actions could be taken by governments to provide that tourism reinforces the development.

First and foremost, it is irrefutable to note that profits which tourism is presenting to economies are immeasurable. Prevailingly, globetrotting, apart from serving as an exhilarating activity for tourists, is becoming a profound source of income for many host countries. Not surprisingly, the industry is creating new workplaces whilst opportunities for unemployed citizens. Obviously, this tendency is contributing to a drastic decline in rates of unemployment. For instance, tourism is feeding majority of poor families dwelling in African and mid-Asian developing countries.

Admittedly, tourism brings some considerable damages for visited areas. Today, it is an acknowledgeable truth that not all visitors' attitude is positive towards the hosts. Plainly, countries endeavor to create the most luxurious conveniences for the trotters and this is actually a labor-intensive deed. Eventually, locals are commencing to "sacrifice" themselves and ensure tourists with hot showers and accommodations.

Nonetheless, there are several number of viable remedies to eliminate the harm. Governments may impose constraints on having an access to fragile places and construct special hotels for tourist to live in. This would function somehow against the financial aspect, but provide protection for the vulnerability.

To recapitulate, although tourism is one of the chief sources of profit, it is mentionable to advocate the impinge on host country in some ways. But, governments are capable to alleviate the downside and tourism remains beneficial for the development.

Writing Feedback / In prevailing days, it is a ubiquitous concern that there is an ascended dependence on cars. [5]

More and more people are relying on the private car as their major means of transportation

In prevailing days, it is a ubiquitous concern that, there is an ascended dependence on cars. Many people acknowledge the obstacles that cars contribute to a life of human race. In this essay, I would cite some hazards of this overreliance and feasible rectifications an accordance to my perspective.

To begin with, it is permissible that regular automobile use impinges on human race in various aspects of life encompassing physical, moral or even psychological. Obviously, individuals cannot probably imagine their life without driving, as they use their vehicles from going to work to even dropping in on a market for purchasing a tiny item. It is undeniable to concede the fact that it seems they are gradually losing the ability of walking. Furthermore, there is a tendency in which some people possess a car to use it as an indicator of their social status. Plainly, luxurious cars are not affordable for all and there might be somewhat psychological suffering among poor sectors.

Actually, in this situation, there are several number of viable remedies. First and foremost, it is quite acceptable to impose public transport more in quantity and contemporary in quality. This would definitely appeal people to abandon their driving habits and adapt the usage of public transport. Apart from this, even further, citizens ought to be elucidated the significance of walking on foot until they fathom in depth. Tangibly, it appears that once there is a possibility of people's preference on being pedestrian, which is much healthier.

To take all mentioned into consideration, the issue of car overdependence, which has been a long-enduring challenge for the humankind, is still our lives. Fortunately, there are some possible actions could be taken to eliminate this. However, this transition might take an exponential interim of time.