EF_Team2
Jul 7, 2007
Writing Feedback / Comparison Essay--Rushdie and Doctorow [7]
Greetings!
I think you've done an excellent job! I have just a few suggestions:
... these writers focus on secular humanism. Nevertheless, Rushdie's and Doctorow's dissimilar style of writing affects readers differently.
Through Rushdie's critical style of writing, "Imagine There's No Heaven" is considered more stirring. [is considered by whom? It might be better to leave out "considered."]
Rushdie uses increasing human's intelligence as a defense for his exclamation to be known that all religion is "simply wrong." - I'm not clear on what "increasing human's intelligence means; it should be humans', though.
Rushdie blames religion for many problems that society faces
On the contrary, the readers are enraged and feel that they have been insulted. - You can't speak for all readers. Some might not feel that way.
Essentially, Rushdie is telling the reader that religion prohibits a person from thinking for himself and his community.
Thus, he infuriates the readers, who have practiced their religion for many years. - Again, you are expressing your own views as if they are held by everyone. You could say "he risks infuriating readers..."
Clearly, Doctorow makes evident that Americans abusively use religion to justify their actions or defenses. Through Doctorow's logical argument, he is able to sway the readers and make them understand why we are infidels. - Better might be "he makes a persuasive argument that..."
Just be careful about making sweeping statements that purport to represent the opinions of everyone. Other than that, great job!
Thanks,
Sarah, EssayForum.com
Greetings!
I think you've done an excellent job! I have just a few suggestions:
... these writers focus on secular humanism. Nevertheless, Rushdie's and Doctorow's dissimilar style of writing affects readers differently.
Through Rushdie's critical style of writing, "Imagine There's No Heaven" is considered more stirring. [is considered by whom? It might be better to leave out "considered."]
Rushdie uses increasing human's intelligence as a defense for his exclamation to be known that all religion is "simply wrong." - I'm not clear on what "increasing human's intelligence means; it should be humans', though.
Rushdie blames religion for many problems that society faces
On the contrary, the readers are enraged and feel that they have been insulted. - You can't speak for all readers. Some might not feel that way.
Essentially, Rushdie is telling the reader that religion prohibits a person from thinking for himself and his community.
Thus, he infuriates the readers, who have practiced their religion for many years. - Again, you are expressing your own views as if they are held by everyone. You could say "he risks infuriating readers..."
Clearly, Doctorow makes evident that Americans abusively use religion to justify their actions or defenses. Through Doctorow's logical argument, he is able to sway the readers and make them understand why we are infidels. - Better might be "he makes a persuasive argument that..."
Just be careful about making sweeping statements that purport to represent the opinions of everyone. Other than that, great job!
Thanks,
Sarah, EssayForum.com