Writing Feedback / How much do drivers spend on petrol? [2]

The line graph provides information regarding the amount of petrol spent people in two different countries and it is measured in the percentage of income. Overall, what stands out from the graph shows that poorest and middle-income in USA spent more income on petrol than those was in UK. However, in UK richest people used much more money for petrol instead of USA's richest individuals.

In detail, in USA poorest persons spent far much income on petrol than those was in the same country who had other income and was in UK. In contrast, the gap between middle-income of people in USA and UK allocating budgets for petrol saw narrowed considerably.

A closer look at the data reveals that more richest people in UK took income to consume petrol than USA's. Although both those in these countries had parallel downward trend in consuming petrol, UK's wealthiest people was more than USA'.

• 
  
  

Writing Feedback / Maintaining body health and saving the world as a whole with eating no meat or fish [2]

Some people choose to eat no meat or fish. They believe that this is not only better for their own health but also benefits the world as a whole. Discuss this view and give your own opinion.

More and more people now neglect to consume meat or fish. They argue that this benefits for either their own health or the world as a whole. As far as I am concerned, it is believed that this will encourage plenty of people to have healthy diet as they frequently consume food far fewer calories and less fat. Again, what individuals do this is a shape of responsibilities in saving the world from danger global warming affected greenhouses gases produced the amount of meat production.

A group who says YES would argue that people could change their habit of eating so as to be good diet. For instance, persons emphasizes food of fruits, vegetables, grains, beans, legumes and nuts which all are rich in fiber, vitamin and other nutrients, so this can prevent people obtaining a serious risk of deadly disease. This is relevant with an Australia significant study released that people who consume no meat has a protective effect and immune system of heart disease. As a result, naturally finding alternative foods is the great way to reach a perfect health.

In addition to this, meat production increases global warming considerably. As per a 2006 reported by the United Nation Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), this study reveals that current production levels of meat contribute between 14 and 12 percent of the 36 million tons of CO2 - equivalent greenhouse gases the world produce it every year which is caused by manufacturing half a pound of hamburger. As a consequence, the more people eat meat, the more world is threatened, since the amount of meat production is forecasted to raise far more rapid effects on greenhouse gas emissions and atmospheric concentrations.

The aforementioned evidence reveals that people come up with their interest to protect their own health and to contribute preserving safety earth from climate change. Therefore, I would argue that this approach brings all changes better. Where possible, government and health authorities are likely to campaign this issue massively with the intention of attracting more individuals to follow the trend.

Writing Feedback / Should all education and healthcare be funded by the government and free for everyone? [2]

All education and healthcare should be funded by the government and free for everyone.

To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion.

Give reason for your answer and include any relevant example from your own knowledge or experience.

The idea that government should be responsible to provide the safety net such as education and healthcare are debatable motion. As far as I am concerned, it is believed by some people that education and healthcare are backbone of human being, which has to be freely available from the government to every society. However, others tend to think that the government should fund these services depending on demands of citizens since not all of them will go hospital and enroll at the school or college. As such, I personally agree with former opinion.

First of all, education and healthcare is largely considered a basic right for every person. The main reason of this is if a population is unable to calculate, read and write, they will be doomed in such a competitive global economy. Meanwhile, if people are unhealthy, they will lose mobility for working. The result of this is a rise of unemployment and poverty rates, so a problem faced by the government will be more and more complicated. Therefore, a state education and healthcare should be secured by government to all of social societies without charging.

Having said that, opponents of this idea argue that the government should guarantee both services based on request of individuals as not the whole citizens, paying tax revenue every time, will solve their health problem by controlling hospital doctors. To illustrate of this, more persons now run physical exercise regularly and have balanced diet to maintain their better life, while some of societies prefer to study outside school. Then, these attitudes will lead more and more people to perceive never government's budget for free both services. As a result, it is just waste of money from tax revenue, if government continue to afford these services with free of charge for all of citizens.

The aforementioned evidence reveals that it is arguably that many people probably will not require free education and healthcare in their life, but for some both cervices play a significant role in advanced economic competition globally. Therefore, I totally suggest that the government should be allocated more money to enhance education and healthcare freely for everyone as a key factor of any successful society.

Writing Feedback / Overweight now is becoming a serious health threat globally [2]

Obesity is now a major global epidemic. What can be done to tackle this increasingly common problem?

An obvious issue of obesity today is becoming a serious health threat. As far as I am concerned, the cause of this is more and more citizens feel comfortable with their sedentary lifestyle and prefer fast food as their routine consumption, which result a higher risk of disease for them such as coronary heart disease, diabetes and cancer. To solve the problem, I would argue that to educate children eating healthy food will arouse individuals' self-conscious to come up with changing their unhealthy eating food. Meanwhile, encouraging societies to run physical exercise regularly are another viable solution to enhance a way of healthy life.

First of all, improving children's knowledge of how important consume healthy food as a vital aspect of perfect health. To illustrate of this, if all of parents and teachers are in charge of children to be well-educated and well-informed about healthy eating habit, this will ensure the children to be more likely to eat vegetables and drink considerably less sugary beverages. As a result, this approach absolutely encourages the children to respect for their own bodies.

Then, another an important factor for weight loss is exercising efficiently and high-intensity. This is because by running mental exercise far intensive will boosts HGH production, which is truly essential for well-being health, fitness and weight management. Again, this pattern also is going to raise heart health rate in long run. In addition to this, with high regularly exercise and adding a healthy diet will be an effective fat-burning machine to restore an excellent health normally. Last but not least, this will prevent a deadly disease such as cardiac arrest for blood circulation system in human body can be normal function.

The aforementioned evidence reveals that parents and teachers play an important role in solving this problem through having control their children over growing time, whilst persons' awareness to plan exercise program regularly will excel this case to reach an optimal solution. Therefore, I would recommend that government should take charge of the problem like to restrict advertising fast-food industry which is exposed massively on television, so that either parents or teachers can maximize in educating the children to protect consuming a danger food.

Writing Feedback / The cause and measurement in solving the rise of crime rate [2]

Each year, the crime rate increases. What are the causes of crime and what could be done to prevent this rise in criminal activity.

It is argued that more and more an annual crime rate grows up absolutely. As far as I am concerned, a rise of unemployment and poverty issues is key factor causing this problem more complicated. This is since for some citizens being criminal is a basic approach to survive in an economy competition. Again, broken families or single parenthood contributed in increasing crime rate. To solve this problem, government should provide more job fields for young people to enable everyone to reach their goals or fulfill life needs and also enact stringent laws for burdening criminal.

First of all, a major reason of this is the increase of unemployment and poverty rate per year. A significant study, conducted by Statistics Department of Lithuanian Republic Government, reported that the number of offenses per 100,000 population in 2005-2011 period basically correlates with unemployment trend rate indicators. Another result on this topic fund that in Europe unemployment and income inequalities have become the markers of social cohesion and sense or lack thereof, which generate more aggressive behavior as a reaction to social bias and discrimination. Undoubtedly, a growth rate in violent crimes is truly affected by how the number of unemployment and poverty rate is.

Another cause of the problem is broken families or single parenthood. According to an article recorded that in the UK seven out of 10 children being offenders come from broken homes, whilst the children having single parent families are more than twice as likely to live in committing crime instead of those living with both parents. In addition to this, a similar result showed that a ten per cent increase in the percentage of American children living in single-parent homes leads typically to a seventeen percent increase in juvenile crime.

Therefore, despite the complex problem, it is believed that the government is responsible for the developing of more workplace option. To illustrate this, if all of persons in a country carries out a good job permanently with a stable income, they will gain an improvement of profound life quality. As a result, by improving economic status of societies, the issues of crime rate growth can be overcome confidently. Also, the authority of judicial institution should provide a strict regulation of crime issues to pressure the number of crime rise. This is because people tend to worry to commit crime repeatedly, if they receive an extraordinary punishment.

The aforementioned evidence reveals that although crime rate experiences an obvious rise per year, this can be solved by building a comfortable workplace and formulating a strict policy from the government. Therefore, I would argue that to maximize in solving this should the government not just focus on providing job fields or making regulation, but arouse individuals' self-conscious to respect for the rules of society too.

Writing Feedback / Could alternative energy sources replace fossil-fuel energy? [2]

Alternative energy source that use natural power of the wind, waves, and sun are too expensive and complicated to replace the coal, oil and gas that we use to power our cities and transport.

To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

It is believed fossil fuels energy such as coal, oil and gas cannot be replaced by the usage of renewable energy in supplying energy for cities and transport. This is because the one is valued to save heavy process. As such, I personally agree with this motion since the renewable cannot produce as much as energy from non-renewable resources. Furthermore, due to unpredictable weather and large capital cost, some people deny hinging on alternative natural resources only.

First of all, natural resources of renewable are far hard to generate in large quantity of energy. According to an article reported that in 2011 some kind of alternative energy, which includes wind, waves and sun, just generate 1.6% of world energy supply. The article also released that this total cannot cover energy for basic needs of 7 billion cities' people around the world, whilst it has trillions of dollars of cars, trucks, airplanes, and construction machinery built to use the whole energy of coal, oil and gas. As a result, alternative natural energy sources provide considerably obstacles to displace non-renewable in producing energy to power individuals' activities.

Another problem is the refusal of societies to focus on new natural resources. Firstly, the system of it; wind, waves and sunshine energy, relies indeed upon the unpredictable weather for supply resources. If the weather does not produce a good climate condition, the alternative sources will be lack of capacity to make energy. Secondly, this requires large capital cost to build renewable plants and to maintain them. Without carrying this, the sources will not result enough energy for people's needs. And last but not least, this system involves wider land tracks. The reason is to meet up with the enormous quantities of electricity produced by fossil-fuel resources, their plants need to be set up. Undoubtedly, some critical issues of alternative energy bring much arduousness for persons to be enthusiastic energy consumers.

The aforementioned evidence reveals that lack of energy resulted from alternative natural resources and some troubles of it indicate there is profound doubtful to change fuel to renewable power. Therefore, I would argue that although people might need to leave their dependence on fossil-fuel resources in the future, it is not easy plan done in a short time.