Writing Feedback / Giving possibility to choose subjects students prefer or enforcing obligatory subjects at schools? [5]

An opinion essay about discussing views and giving personal opinion

Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.

Focusing on subjects they have interest in or following obligatory subjects are still the concern for university students. Some express the opinion that studying favourite subjects will motivate students immensely whereas others state that students should just study subjects which do wonders for their future occupations. From my perspectives, I suppose that there's a need for the combination of both these subjects to reach the maximun benefits for university students.

Initially, that students are allowed to study subjects they are fond of brings some beneficial aspects to themselves. As a usual, students tend to be more encouraged and motivated when doing something they are interested in, which results in high productivity. Additionally, studying prefered subjects also enriches students' knowledge, which plays a fundamental role in their future orientations.

Apart from concentrating on subjects above, students have to strive to study other ones that are relative to their future jobs. These subjects might not draw any students' attraction or interest; nevertheless, they will bring tremendous advantages to students' future preparation. It is lucid to say that these subjects which equip undergraduates with the enormous amount of knowledge with respect to diverse subjects, which supplies them with the firm basis prepared for the future occupation.

As a conclusion, that turning the focus to subjects university students are passionate about or ones that are predominantly applied to the future both brings advantageous sides. Yet, to optimize the benefits of studying, I personally think that these subjects are combined to support students' future is literally in need.

Writing Feedback / An essay about discussing when it's better for children to learn a new language. [2]

Topic: Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school.
Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?

picking up a new language early

Many perspectives are that children should set about taking in new language at elementary school than secondary school. Indeed, absorbing a new language at a younger age will benefit children's development process, which brings tremendous advantages even though it still has some disadvantages. However, the advantages are definitely Superior to drawbacks.

Learning a new language at primary school is certainly the best period for children. A ton of scientific researches point out that children from 8 to 12 years old truly have better capability of picking up a new language than others. The reasons for this are in relation to the fact that children at this age still have a large sum of learning space in their brains. They are still not overwhelmed by a lot of knowledge from the society. Additionally, the manner that children of that age learn a new language are really distinct from others. Children feel more relaxed to play with the language and they don't bear pressure much.

Approaching a new language Ripes many benefits for primary children. When they obtain higher education, they are about to get more opportunities. For instance, as children learn English in elementary school, they may have chances in secondary school such as international scholarships, foreign activities, so on . Moreover, children surely have more time to enhance the language ability instead of merely having some first steps with the language in higher education. With their background knowledge in primary School, their language learning process in secondary school will be concentrated harder in the higher levels.

However, there are still some disadvantages of learning new language in primary School. In particular, children may get the mixed language which is the combination between the mother tongue and foreign language. Nevertheless, it is fairly easy for them to get over this issue by the teacher's supports.

In conclusion, no matter children start to learn a new language at primary school or secondary school, it always gives them many advantages. However, picking up a new language at an earlier age will ripe more benefits than others.

I hope you guys will give me many feedbacks. Please, be hard on my wring; point out my mistakess. I'm really thankful and grateful for you guys.

Writing Feedback / An opinion essay about discussing views and giving personal opinion. [4]

The topic: Some people believe that children learn better when they are placed in classes with children of similar abilities. Others believe that children learn better when they are in classes with children representing a diverse range of academic abilities. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

learning environment for a child

Some people suppose that the most effective learning way for children is to collaborate with many children of the similar academic levels. Others believe that it is more productive for children to learn with others having a broad diversity of knowledge, which I immensely concur with.

The collaboration with superior friends brings many benefits to children's learing process. They can accquire more knowledge from various fields, which helps advance their self development accademically. As children study with smart peers, they can be able to explore what they are truly concerned about, which is completely good for their future orientation. Additionally, staying in such that good environment will push each kid forward, which is the tremendous source of motivation.

Besides, such a cooperation with other children of the same levels aslo ripes some benefits. Since they stay in a normal environment like others, they will have an easier understanding about what their friends say. Therefore, they might not feel overwhelmed and confused by complicated things. Plus, the curriculum is not very difficult ;so, they do not feel under pressure much. Moreover, they will pick up new things with the ease.

However, I believe that the non-pressure environment does not create many good children. This means that they might not get a large range of knowledge if they are not pressured or motivated by the environment. They can not be the best versions of themselves in academic aspects.

In conclusion, learning in any environment is still good and brings some specific benefits for children. Nevertheless, whether they can be good children or not mostly depends on patience and determination that they put on their learning process.

I hope you guys will help me correct my writing. Thank you so much!