melramadhani
Sep 4, 2014
Undergraduate / Evaluate ethical dilemma you have faced & its impact to you - questbridge nat'l college match [7]
Indonesia is a multicultural country, consisting more than 400 ethnic tribes with their own different traditions and cultures. However, there are two characteristics that we have in common : religiousness and conservativeness. We are tolerant to different religious affiliations, but we are not tolerant to atheism; people must believe in God. We are tolerant to different cultures and traditions, but we are not tolerant to significant differences to the society such as unusual sexual preferences. Beliefs that are unconventional are generally considered immoral, no matter how logical they may be.
So, when I was in an open debate about LGBT marriage, which was a part of the selection test for student government membership, I wasn't surprised that there were only two people who supported LGBT marriage : Astri, my debate team member, and I.
Personally, I support the marriage of people with unusual sex preferences : lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT). People can be forced to do anything but to feel or think, because feeling and thought are something physically nonexistent. So, when two individuals with same gender love each other, what can people do? Can people force them to stay away from each other? Yes. But can people force them to stop loving? Of course not!
I believe in my religion, and my holy Qur'an states that engaging in same sex activities is sinful. But I also believe that people have the ultimate right to believe (or not to believe) in something. LGBT people have the right to believe if being LGBT is a sin or not. And even if they believe that being LGBT is a sin, they still have the right to choose to sin or not. Beliefs and choices, similar to feelings, are physically nonexistent thus cannot be forced.
In debate tournaments, I would be happy to express my opinion towards LGBT marriage. I had to support any statements assigned to me anyway. But supporting LGBT marriage in other situations (such as this open debate test), where I can choose not to support, is a different case. People might think I am kafir, extremist, and consider me unethical and immoral.
But I couldn't deny my own thoughts. I couldn't say that I believe in something while I actually don't. I also didn't want to spread more hatred towards LGBT people, which are marginalized already. So, with Astri, I supported LGBT marriage. Two against fifty.
The debate went as predicted. The rest of the participants refused LGBT marriage, still not convinced with our logical arguments that usually convinced the adjudicators in debate tournaments. There was no winner of the debate since the debate is aimed only to measure communication skills; we were supposed to forget anything that happened in the debate. Yet people mocked me after the debate, accusing me as lesbian (Astri was lucky to have a boyfriend at that time). But I didn't regret my decision. People would soon forget anyway.
However, I passed the test. At least my arguments convinced the selection committees.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For review :
1. Do you enjoy reading this essay?
2. What character(s) do I have according to this essay?
3. Any grammatical / language mistakes? Please point out!
Thank you {}
Indonesia is a multicultural country, consisting more than 400 ethnic tribes with their own different traditions and cultures. However, there are two characteristics that we have in common : religiousness and conservativeness. We are tolerant to different religious affiliations, but we are not tolerant to atheism; people must believe in God. We are tolerant to different cultures and traditions, but we are not tolerant to significant differences to the society such as unusual sexual preferences. Beliefs that are unconventional are generally considered immoral, no matter how logical they may be.
So, when I was in an open debate about LGBT marriage, which was a part of the selection test for student government membership, I wasn't surprised that there were only two people who supported LGBT marriage : Astri, my debate team member, and I.
Personally, I support the marriage of people with unusual sex preferences : lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT). People can be forced to do anything but to feel or think, because feeling and thought are something physically nonexistent. So, when two individuals with same gender love each other, what can people do? Can people force them to stay away from each other? Yes. But can people force them to stop loving? Of course not!
I believe in my religion, and my holy Qur'an states that engaging in same sex activities is sinful. But I also believe that people have the ultimate right to believe (or not to believe) in something. LGBT people have the right to believe if being LGBT is a sin or not. And even if they believe that being LGBT is a sin, they still have the right to choose to sin or not. Beliefs and choices, similar to feelings, are physically nonexistent thus cannot be forced.
In debate tournaments, I would be happy to express my opinion towards LGBT marriage. I had to support any statements assigned to me anyway. But supporting LGBT marriage in other situations (such as this open debate test), where I can choose not to support, is a different case. People might think I am kafir, extremist, and consider me unethical and immoral.
But I couldn't deny my own thoughts. I couldn't say that I believe in something while I actually don't. I also didn't want to spread more hatred towards LGBT people, which are marginalized already. So, with Astri, I supported LGBT marriage. Two against fifty.
The debate went as predicted. The rest of the participants refused LGBT marriage, still not convinced with our logical arguments that usually convinced the adjudicators in debate tournaments. There was no winner of the debate since the debate is aimed only to measure communication skills; we were supposed to forget anything that happened in the debate. Yet people mocked me after the debate, accusing me as lesbian (Astri was lucky to have a boyfriend at that time). But I didn't regret my decision. People would soon forget anyway.
However, I passed the test. At least my arguments convinced the selection committees.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For review :
1. Do you enjoy reading this essay?
2. What character(s) do I have according to this essay?
3. Any grammatical / language mistakes? Please point out!
Thank you {}