Writing Feedback / ielts-scientific research done by companies [NEW]

Any one can offer some suggestions? I have problem with the Task Achievement part, i often feel my essays are not logical... lol

In today's world, it is private companies rather than governments who pay for and carry out most scientific research. Do advantages outweigh disadvantages?

There is a growing number of scientific research carried out by private companies.I believe this trend has more blessings than curses.

when most research are done by companies,this action will enjoy many merits.At first, compared with governments, companies can do research more efficiently because they are profit-driven.This means that new innovations can be released to the market more quickly,which not only can meet consumers demand, but can also drive the development of related industry. Moreover, in order to distract consumers from rival companies, it is likely for companies to reduce the price of their commodities,benefiting consumers economically. If it were not the competition in cell phone industry,consumers would be impossible to buy cell phones with less and less money. In addition,when research is done by companies, governments can also save funds,enabling them to make investments on addressing more urgent problems.

Nevertheless,research carried out by companies also suffer from downsides.The most alarming problem is that there are many companies researching on some products with hazardous impact on society. For example,some companies do research about weapons of mass destruction and sell them to different countries. It is the availability of these weapons that provided conditions for the eruption of some nuclear wars,leading to lots of injuries and casualties. In addition，some research like military research is related to secretes of a nation,making it less safe to be done by companies since companies may disclose confidential information to earn money. However,nowadays, many governments have realized those problems and legislation have been made to curb them. .

As a conclusion, though offering private companies the right to do research in scientific field have deremits,measures have been taken to mitigate those negative influence.Therefore, this phenomenon has more pluses than minuses .

Writing Feedback / Ielts Task 2-should government spend money on saving languages [2]

HI guys .. I am going to take the test in one week... a bit nervous, and i still feel that my essay has lots of problems..

hope you can give me some suggestions . Thanks you !!

Some people think governments should spend money on measures to save languages with few speakers from dying out completely. Others think this is a waste of financial resources. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

290

Nowadays,nearly no country is immune from the problem of the extinction of some languages. However, people hold different opinions about whether governments should be responsible for rescuing those endangered languages. This essay discusses both sides of this argument and then I will give my own perspective on this topic.

Many people believe that it is imperative for governments to allocate funds to prevent some languages from dying out.For one thing,this action can enrich people's understanding of history,which may inspire them to some extent.There are many historical activities recorded by ancient languages which is at the risk of extinction today，making it possible for anthropologists to decipher historical mysteries by translating those information into modern languages. For another, given that most endangered languages speakers are people from minority groups and it is undeniable that languages can reflect culture,protecting those languages can probably allow the cultural characteristics of certain groups of people alive,preventing cultrual identity being jeopardized.

Nevertheless,there are people questioning the need for protecting moribund languages,claiming that the conservation of languages spoken by decreasing amount of people leads to a financial loss that outweighs the merits. This is because if governments want to preserve those languages,they may need to popularize them firstly.However, compared with those widely used languages such as Spanish,English,or Chinese, the areas where endangered languages are used is rather limited.As a result,less people apt to learn them. Hence,no matter how much money is spent on revitalizing those languages,the effectiveness may not be guaranteed,causing the investments being futile.

In my view,concerning about all those benefits conserving endangered languages can bring to society,governments should distributing money on this area.Though making them spoken by overwhelming number of people may not be possible,governments can only focus on the preserving the research and cultural value of them.

Writing Feedback / Ielts- who have the greatest influence on the world [3]

Hi everyone, my third essay .. Thank you for your comments on my previous essays,your suggestions helped me alot.

Topic: Some people think that politicians have the greatest influence on the world. Other people, however, believe that scientists have the greatest influence. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

26
It is undeniable that our world is changing at an exponential rate. However,people hold distinctive opinions about who affects this phenomemon mostly.

77
Some people believe that politicans play the most paramount role in this case.This mainly because they are the person who set the vision of a country and launch related policies affecting a nation's future. For example, Araham Lincoln,the former President of US, unified United States and set it on the course to become the most powerful nation.Without this man, the US would probably has never donimated the world for decades,which would make the world today dramatically different.

89
Nevertheless, there are many people questioning this statement and they claim that scientists have the biggest impact on the world. Scientific achievements can promote the world's development. For instance,given that long-distance transportation tools have made it possible for products to be tranported between countries beyond boundaries,international trade has been promoted,which drived the economic growth globally. Meanwhile,science is also a negative force to the world.It is an abundance of green house gases emitted by vehicles and refrigerators that contributes to the global warming. Due to the temperature increase,many species of flora and fauna have become extinct.

45
In my opinion, there is no major influence on the world .Instead, the vision made by politicians and scientists' innovations are constantly interacting. It is the reciprocal impact of the two that shapes the world's characteristics and dictates how the world will develop.If this were not true, then we would be alble to predict the future world merely based on politicians' decisions.

As a conclusion,I believe,neither politicians nor scientists is the major influence on our society,but that both have powerful effects.

I feel the tense in the second paragraph is not very suitable,the example of long distance transportation..
I'm wondering if I used it in a wrong way

I am glad to hear your response
BR
Lynn

Writing Feedback / Ielts-how to help poor countries? [4]

Rich countries often give financial aid to poor countries, but it does not solve poverty, so rich countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than the financial aid. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

52
Although people's living standard has been improved exponentially in the past mellennia,there are still some countries with the majority of their people living under the poverty line. It is suggested that offering financial support to those areas is futile. We'd rather find alternative types of assistance. However, I disagree with this statement.

99
It is understandable that why many people hold this view. For one thing, given that financial resources are more likely to address urgent problems such as food scarcity and shortage of dwellings, their impacts on a country's development can hardly last long. In contrast, other means of aid which include sending specialists to recipent countries and donating them advanced machines can contribute to more sustainable development,and it is the continuty that guarantee a country's well-being. For another, it is possible that domestic politicians may fail to allocate the money effectivly or they may embezzle it themselves,leading to great losts.

100
Nevertheless, financial aid also plays an inevitable role in revitalizing a region.It is true that this method can only alleviate the most immediate hazards. However,if those problems can not be curbed,people's survival will be jeoperdized,let alone thriving in society.For example,if a country is too poor to provide sufficient food to feed its citizens,their health condition can not be garanteeded,which causes the shrink of labour force. No matter how much professional experience a country can learn from others and how much cutting-edge techonology it possesses, lacking people to utilize those resources, this country is impossible to extricate itself from a plight.

26
As a conclusion,granted that other means of helping impoverished areas have more advantages than financial aid,the paramount role financial funding plays should not be overlooked.

Any one can give me some suggestion about this essay? I still think my last paragraph is too short,do you have any idea about it?

Thanks a lot

Writing Feedback / IETLS-the only way to protect the environment is at an international level [7]

Hi everyone, this is my first essay posted here. My goal is to get a 8 in the exam after three weeks.. That is must be very difficult,but I have to work hard on it.

Topic:
Environmental problems are too big for individual countries and individual persons to address. In other words, we have reached the stage where the only way to protect the environment is at an international level. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

44
Environmental pollution has been deteriorating at an exponential rate.It is believed that this nagative trend can only be slowed down by interntaional cooperation rather than by countries' individual work. However, I suppose both individual and international efforts are paramount to the conservation of environment.

117
It is true that many environmental hazards need to be curbed internationlly.For one thing ,given that most enironmental problems are caused by human behaviours gloably,it is less likely for them to be solved by relying on the efforts of few countries. For example, it is mainly the increased greenhouse gas emmisions worldwide that contribute to the global warming.If only few countries reduce their emmisions accompanying by continuous pollution of other countries,this phenomenon will by no means disappear. For another,granted that all countries can make their efforts voluntarily, addressing this problem internationaly can raise more funding and bring together specialists of broader fields without boundar, which makes big environmental concerns to be tackled effectively.

105
Nevertheless,contributions of individual countries and individual pereson are not futile in this case. Individual's efforts are necessary to improve environment because the world is made up by individual person and the collective efforts of every individual will make a difference. When everyone swifts from using traditional paper to those made of renewable materials, factories will stop cutting tress, reducing deforestation. Meanwhile, governments are able to take many measures to address problems confined to their own countires.For instance, by imposing stiff penalties ,governments can enhance legislation about discharging industrial waste, detering factories from continuing destroy the invironment.

As a conclusion, in order to solve enviromental issues,neither international efforts and individual contributions can be neglected.

Any one can give me some suggestions?