EF_Kevin
Apr 7, 2010
Research Papers / Antidepressants: A physiological, behavioural, theoretical, and clinical review [5]
Not a single occurrence of the word "nowadays" :-D
Your APA looks great...
Here is a word you can cut:
...discussed in detail, withan emphasis on their history, pharmacokinetics, mechanisms of action, and side effects.
The paper ends by evaluating the overall effectiveness of antidepressants in treating depression and concluding that ________.--- In this spot, I would mention and significant conclusions. Usually, an abstract will mention any notable findings. I don't know if that is feasible for you in this case, but it's just something to think about.
Oh, as I continue to read I see that you do take a firm stance.
I like the discussion you give, which culminates with this:
True, but therapy does not have an inordinate amount of unpleasant and potentially lethal side effects. Drugs do. ---- the change I made causes it to be grammatically correct and alo more poignant.
Moreover, the continued use of antidepressants is based on the assumption that depression is caused by depleted MAs levels-an assumption of which many researchers have become increasingly skeptical , and rightly so. ---- yes, but there is still the question of whether to use antidepressants or not. Even if depression is not CAUSED BY depleted MA levels, that does not mean we cannot treat it by chemically raising them.
Do you really mean to suggest that they should not be used at all? Based on your conclusion, it seems to be an argument that they should be banned. This is obviously an impressive essay, but you should come to a solid conclusion about what you are saying. Maybe you mean to say something a little more complex instead of just condemning their use. Something about the importance of patient education, maybe.
:-)
Not a single occurrence of the word "nowadays" :-D
Your APA looks great...
Here is a word you can cut:
...discussed in detail, with
The paper ends by evaluating the overall effectiveness of antidepressants in treating depression and concluding that ________.--- In this spot, I would mention and significant conclusions. Usually, an abstract will mention any notable findings. I don't know if that is feasible for you in this case, but it's just something to think about.
Oh, as I continue to read I see that you do take a firm stance.
I like the discussion you give, which culminates with this:
True, but therapy does not have an inordinate amount of unpleasant and potentially lethal side effects. Drugs do. ---- the change I made causes it to be grammatically correct and alo more poignant.
Moreover, the continued use of antidepressants is based on the assumption that depression is caused by depleted MAs levels-an assumption of which many researchers have become increasingly skeptical , and rightly so. ---- yes, but there is still the question of whether to use antidepressants or not. Even if depression is not CAUSED BY depleted MA levels, that does not mean we cannot treat it by chemically raising them.
Do you really mean to suggest that they should not be used at all? Based on your conclusion, it seems to be an argument that they should be banned. This is obviously an impressive essay, but you should come to a solid conclusion about what you are saying. Maybe you mean to say something a little more complex instead of just condemning their use. Something about the importance of patient education, maybe.
:-)
