Moonshadow0302
Oct 29, 2009
Undergraduate / Biology, "mock trial" - University of Michigan Essay [15]
I agree with all the above suggestions - the first version of the essay made no sense whatsoever. The second one is a definite improvement, but I think more than anything the use of "big" words without knowing the meaning of them, makes the essay a complete mess. Here are some instances which I think you should look into -
What do you mean by this? Was it a situation that existed or was it an imaginary situation that you had created in your mind?
Again, what do you mean you attempted to find "inhibit"?
This sentence should perhaps read - I had no other motive than to indulge my curiosity. I had every scenario played out in my mind before I had even started, and gave each considerable importance.
A subject cannot be imperious, people can be imperious.
This is toooo verbose - try to use simpler words. You will not be impressing the Adcom through your use of such big words.
transpired does not fit in here - I presume you meant "inspired"
what do you mean compatible with you?
Your curiosity cannot be the pioneer, you might be the pioneer. Also what do you mean by 'the central dogma that is biology" what is biology the central dogma to??
I would suggest you redo your entire essay removing all these unnecessary words and replace them with simpler language.
I agree with all the above suggestions - the first version of the essay made no sense whatsoever. The second one is a definite improvement, but I think more than anything the use of "big" words without knowing the meaning of them, makes the essay a complete mess. Here are some instances which I think you should look into -
by the sheer magnitude of the situation I had created in my mind when I touched these "live organs".
What do you mean by this? Was it a situation that existed or was it an imaginary situation that you had created in your mind?
I attempted to find inhibit the growth of BKV virus
Again, what do you mean you attempted to find "inhibit"?
I had no motive other than to succumb my curiosity. I had every scenario played out in my mind before I even started and gave each significant importance.
This sentence should perhaps read - I had no other motive than to indulge my curiosity. I had every scenario played out in my mind before I had even started, and gave each considerable importance.
The imperious nature of this subject allowed me
A subject cannot be imperious, people can be imperious.
It is this compulsion which engineered my pursuit of comprehending the subtleties of the biological language.
This is toooo verbose - try to use simpler words. You will not be impressing the Adcom through your use of such big words.
and the challenges presented to my curiosity were what transpired an interest unlike
transpired does not fit in here - I presume you meant "inspired"
curiosity itself is the one thing compatible with me
what do you mean compatible with you?
and is the pioneer to the central dogma that is biology
Your curiosity cannot be the pioneer, you might be the pioneer. Also what do you mean by 'the central dogma that is biology" what is biology the central dogma to??
I would suggest you redo your entire essay removing all these unnecessary words and replace them with simpler language.