Writing Feedback / IELTS-competition or co-operation-which is better? [7]

Question- some people think that a sense of competition in children should be encouraged. Others believe that children who are taught to co-operate rather than compete become more useful adults.

Discuss both these views and give your opinion.

Answer-

The modern society is full of cut-throat competition. Some people think that inculcating co-operative approach in a child is essential while some think that competing is the best way to succeed. However, co-operative approach always helps a child to become a responsible adult with good moral values and a friendly social circle.

Co-operation is essential for teamwork. Educational systems emphasize on encouraging co-operative approach in children. We live in a social setup and mutual help and sharing only leads to success. A person can not learn or achieve everything by oneself. For instance, lions hunt in a team. It is only due to their teamwork that they are able to catch a prey and make task easy. In the same way, co-operative approach will save time, energy and will have a higher success rate.

Nevertheless, co-operation helps to understand other's perspective and learn by their mistakes. It helps to identify one's strengths and weaknesses as compared to others. A co-operative approach can create inspirational and motivational feeling seeing other people's achievements. However, competition is also as important as co-operation.

Unfortunately, the meaning of competion has been modified in a wrong direction. An individual must compete with oneself only, instead of trying to beat others. Competition has helped the development of science and technology. Competition helps in improvement and evolution. For example, every other day, new cars are developed by companies which are more efficient than others. This kind of competition gives customers more options.

However, blind and selfish competition is detrimental. 'Your loss, my gain' kind of competition can never be fruitful in the long run. Competition should be always based on self-improvement rule. A healthy competition which involves raising one's own level above others is the best approach.

Thus, competition and co-operation go hand in hand. These are two sides of the same coin which can't be seperated. I firmly believe that children should be taught co-operation complimented with a healthy competition. They must be made aware of the demerits of selfish competition. When co-operation and healthy competition is followed together, success, achievements, recognition and any goal becomes easier.

Writing Feedback / IELTS-Happiness- factors,definition and importance - Prosperity makes individuals complete [2]

Question-
Happiness is considered very important in life.
Why is it difficult to define?
What factors are important in achieving happiness?

answer-

Happiness is a feeling of contentment and pleasure. Every individual wishes to achieve happiness in life, but happiness is such a complex feeling which can't be defined in just few lines. Every person has different description of happiness and thus, it can't be generalised.

Why is happiness so difficult to define? The only possible reply to this question is that, different people have different perspective and thus different meanings of happiness. For instance, for a poverty stricken labour, getting two meals a day is a happy moment, while for an industrialist, a profit of millions is a reason to be happy. A small child is happy getting a candy while an adult gets happy getting a job. Thus, happiness is a feeling which varies from person to person.

Though happiness is difficult to define, but it is hugely dependent on various factors. A person's expectations is the most important parameter. Expectations sometimes lead to disappointment and when they are fulfilled, one always feels happy. Another very essential factor is self-satisfaction. Without having satisfaction, an individual would feel uncomfortable in their present life and can never be happy. Satisfaction eventually makes a person happy.

Nevertheless, happiness is achieved when there is prosperity. Prosperity makes an individual complete. Prosperity is the availability of the necessities in abundance. Success, achievements, praise, recognition, financial security etc. are some other factors essential for achieving happiness. However, in the society, greed, corruption, selfishness, anger, lust etc. are detrimental to achieve happiness.

Therefore, achieving happiness is an easy and difficult task, both at the same time. If people want to find happiness, they will find it by watching their pets playing. On the other hand, nothing can make a person happy if they are full of greed and selfishness. Happiness is an ultimate feeling of self-contentment which depends on an individual's nature and attitude towards life. Happiness depends how we think our life is and thus its indefinite, undefined and completely abstract.

Writing Feedback / IELTS-most effective media for communication [3]

Q: Compare the advantages and disadvantages of three of the following as media for communicating information.
comics
books
adio
television
film
theatre
State which you consider to be the most effective. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples for you own knowledge or experience.

answer-

The developments in the field of science and technology have significantly accelerated the growth of communication field. From the old age method of sending messengers to the modern age internet and electronic media, the means of communication have evolved exponentially. The three very effective media for communicating information today are- books, televisions and films.

Books are one of the oldest and most traditional method. People still like to read books to enhance knowledge and understand different perspectives. Books written on various social issues, effectively creates awareness among the people.However, books have some limitations too. Firstly, they require time investment and peaceful ambience, which is hard to find in the rapidly moving modern life. Books also have a very limited reach and can't connect to a large mass. Still, with all the disadvantages, people who read books really gain a lot of knowledge.

Another very effective media is television. Televisions are the most sought after method of communication. They can communicate to the largest mass and every strata of the society. Right from an entrepreneur to an illiterate person, everyone can understand and absorb information through television. Most importantly, television can even give life feed of events, so that one can watch anything happening across the globe while sitting at home. Any last minute changes can also be made before delivering the information. Unfortunately, commercialisation has degraded the quality of information. Televisions , nowadays show a lot of vulgar, irrelevant and fictional shows which do not help the society in any way.

The modern society also likes the films made on various issues. Films amalgamate entertainment and social lessons effectively. A lot of films made on social issues effectively impact the common opinion. However, commercial films which are made on useless themes, promoting vulgarity are detrimental. They don't serve any purpose , instead they are just produced with profit maximisation as the sole objective.

The effectiveness of a media depends on the mass it connects to, the time and the ease with which information can be given. I believe that television is the most effective media with a reach to every strata of the society and rapid fast delivery of information. However, the shows broadcasted should be more beneficial and fact based instead of all the useless commercial spicy shows, which serve no purpose.

WRITING TASK 1

The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

You should write at least 150 words.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Family type --- Proportion of people from each household type living in POVERTY

single aged person --- 6% (54,000)
aged couple --- 4% (48,000)
single, no children --- 19% (359,000)
couple, no children --- 7% (211,000)
sole parent --- 21% (232,000)
couple with children --- 12% (933,000)
all households --- 11% (1,837,000)

The given table illustrates the proportion of various kinds of families in Australia, living in poverty in the year 1999. The different family types considered are- single person, aged couple, single couple without children, couple without children, sole parents and couples with children.

The table clearly indicates that out of all the households, 11% people lived in poverty, exactly 1,837,000 people. The maximum number of people, that is 933,000, living in poverty were couples with children (12% of this category). This was followed by single person with no children. 19% people (359,000) fell in this category of poverty stricken families. Sole parents were the third most affected family type which comprised 21% (232,000) people. Couples without children living in poverty were 7% people in this section (211,000 people). 4% (48,000) aged couple and 6% single aged people (54,000), were living in poverty in this year.

Thus from the table, it is clearly evident that couple with children feel the maximum financial burden followed by single (without children) people. Single aged persons and aged couples are the most prosperous family types.

Writing Feedback / IELTS- capital punishment..necessary or not? [5]

question-
Without capital punishment (the death penalty) our lives are less secure and crimes of
violent increase. Capital punishment is essential to control violence in society. To what
extent do you agree or disagree?

answer

Crime is always punishable. Retribution is the method for countering criminals. Some countries have stringent rules, like capital punishment, while other have a lot of flexibility in the judicial system. However, strict laws, like capital punishment, are essential in a society.

Capital punishment is given only in the " rarest of the rare" cases. Its first and foremost objective is safety of other human beings. When a criminal becomes a threat to the society, such that they can commit heinous crimes, then they are given capital punishment. Thus, capital punishment protects the society from hardcore criminals.

Moreover, capital punishment curbs the inspiration and prospects of other hateful crimes. When a criminal mind knows the quantum of punishment, they will fear and not commit such crimes. Thus, the rate of crime and violence is effectively decreased.

Importantly, capital punishment saves a lot of government funding which is wasted in maintenance of these hardcore criminals. Criminals who don't have any chance of improvement or who have a past record of such crimes are, therefore, given capital punishment.

However, the jury giving the verdict are also humans. They have the life of a person at their discretion. They can make mistakes which can sometimes affect an innocent, circumstantially marred criminals. The jury must therefore, take into account the circumstances of committing a crime. For example, if an individual murders someone for self-defence, then such a crime is not heinous. Only deserving criminals, who commit such hateful crimes in their proper senses are subjected to capital punishment.

Capital punishment is essential to control violence in the society. I firmly believe that psychopaths, terrorists or any other criminal who lacks empathy for other human lives deserve capital punishment. Capital punishment helps to safeguard human rights in a strict and effective manner. However, it should be considered as the last option by the jury and all circumstances must be taken into account before pronouncing the final verdict.

Writing Feedback / IELTS-is a break good or bad after high school for students? [4]

topic-

In some countries, young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing high school and starting university studies. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages for young people who decide to do this.

answer-

Studies are an essential part of life.Some countries permit students to take a break from studies between high school and university studies, while in some countries, it is considered as waste of time. However, a break of one year is good for young people after finishing their high school.

In most education systems, a child studies continously from the age of 5 till 16 years of age. A relaxation of one year to young minds will give them a quintessential change. A continous study pressure for over 10 years makes the mind saturated and like a robot, to follow instructions. Personally, a break will give students some time to refresh their systems, by travelling or following their hobbies. Importantly, when students start their university studies after a break, they will feel fresh and full of energy to take the new challenge.

Nevertheless, during high school, many students face a dilemma to decide which stream should they major in. Working or travelling for some time, after high school, can help them to find their field of interest. It will also help them to learn professional setup by working. Financially,students can save a little money to support their university education by doing a job. Some students even utilise this time for preparation of their desired university course.

However, there are also disadvantages. A break can disturb the focus of students and prove detrimental. When students work during these breaks, the feel of money gives them an illusion that such salary is enough for them and they go in a utopia. For instance, my cousin started working in a customer care centre after high school and got distracted. When he started his university studies, he failed miserably. Students can also indulge in smoking or drinking during this time. But , the break should be an optional thing. It varies from individual to individual, how they utilise that period. A break gives students more benefits than harms.

Importantly, the sole purpose of education is to nurture a young mind and not thrust studies on them. Thus, a break should be necessarily allowed to young minds between their high school and university studies. Countries, like India, where such a break is considered a blot, should understand that young minds are delicate and they face a cut-throat competition. One year break can help young people to prepare for the challenges of life.

Writing Feedback / IELTS-computers..use,future prospects and over-dependence. [5]

question-
We are becoming increasingly dependent on computers. They are used in business, hospitals, crime detection and even to fly planes. What things will they be used for in future? Is this dependence on computers a good thing or should we be more suspicious of their benefits?

answer-

Computer-a device which has given a whole new dimension to the human life. Ever since Charles Babbage (know as "Father of computers") invented computers, its development never had a pause. The whole world is dependent on computers, without which, the world will go back hundreds of years.

In the modern world, computers are used everywhere. Right from flying planes to sending a small document, computers are needed. They are used in space programmes , wars, hospitals, schools and so on. Computers have made human life more easy, convenient and lightning fast. For example, in earlier days , if one had to send a message to someone in other country, it used to take months. But today, it can be sent in few minutes by typing a email and few clicks. Computers provide speed, increase efficiency, accuracy, precision, help to increase productivity and other countless benefits are provided by it.

Moreover, future prospects of computers are very bright. From a computer as big as a room, it has now been minimized to the size of a palm. Nanotechnology is working to make computers to the order of microscopic levels. Research on making computerised drone soldiers (unmanned computer controlled) is going on. There is no end to the evolution of computers.

However, everything has pros and cons. Computers have made humans over-dependent. Virus programs, privacy breach, leak of confidential documents, cyber attacks, identity theft, frauds etc. are some of its demerits, from a countless list. Computers expose children to vulgar materials. They have even invaded mental health of humans, for example , FAD (Facebook Addiction Disorder- excessive use of social networking website Facebook). Computers have intruded our lives to the effect that a satellite can peep into our homes and privates lives. The recent case of Wikileaks , leaking confidential data is an example of how computers are harmful.

Nevertheless, with all the mentioned demerits, computers have provided security and sophistication too. Thus, dependence on computers is not a bad thing. However, one needs to be aware of all the pros and cons and beware of malicious things. Computer was invented for the benefit of mankind and it has fulfilled its objective. Human life today can't be imagined without computers, so not depending on them is out of question.

Writing Feedback / IELTS-should universities accept equal number of males/females or not? [4]

topic-
Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Education is important for the development of the world. Its a debatable issue whether universities should accept equal number of males and females in a course or not. However, since both genders are equally important, both must be given equal opportunities. Universities must admit both in equal numbers, depending on their choices.

Right to education is a basic human right of both, males and females. The whole world aims for women empowerment, and to achieve this, females should be given equal opportunities as males. When universities will accept them in equal number, both genders will be able to nurture their talent and a healthy competitive environment will develop.

Co-education helps both genders to gel well with each other. It helps them how to behave and cooperate and work together. For example, students studying in boy's colleges do not generally know how to talk to a female or behave in front of them. On the other hand, females studying in girl's colleges are too shy to face boys. Co-education will help to eradicate this kind of demerit in both. Universities giving both genders equal opportunities, will prepare then for future challenges and will help in the long run.

Unfortunately, some male chauvinists think that women are incapable in particular fields, like maths, mechanical engineering, defence etc. This kind of gender biased approach is detrimental for the development of the society. Time and again, women have proved their mettle in every field. Women like Margaret Thatcher, Indira Gandhi, Mari Curie etc., are symbols of women's intelligence and skills.

Thus, I firmly believe that both genders have equal rights and universities should accept them in equal numbers. Equality in education will help in development of the society.Both genders are the fulcrum of the society and none of them is superior or inferior. Choice of course should be the discretion of the student and their merit, irrespective of the gender. Educational rights must be given to both genders.

Writing Feedback / IELTS-is change required or not? [6]

TOPIC:-
Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change. Others, however, think that change is always a good thing.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

answer-

Life is full of changes.Right from the birth to attaining old age, the only thing which remains constant is - a change. Some prefer to remain in a shell and do the same things repeatedly, while others support the view that change is essential.In fact, the worst thing in life is monotony. A change is quintessential and a necessity for an individual.

Right from our school days,one thing we learn is -practice makes a man perfect. This approach is excellent for attaining expertise in a field.Consistency is a trait desired by many.For instance-Curie couples would had never found radium , if they were not consistent and focussed to extract a small possible quantity from a high magnitude of pitch blende. But what after one attains expertise or reaches the goal? Everyone need to move on and find a new goal, a change to live the life.

A wise man once said, "Not all people live the life, mostly just exist". A change is important to keep people interested, excited and focussed. The mind will get bored and saturated if one keeps doing the same things repeatedly. Change is really important to keep the brain working and interested. When one gets bored, any task seems like a burden. A burden is never desired by anyone and hence, mistakes are bound to occur.

Nevertheless, change is really important to learn about life and to respond to different situations.In life, an individual will not face the same situations, again and again. If a student is taught same book of history repeatedly,throughout the school life, will he/she learn anything new? No.Change helps to enhance knowledge. Without a change, one's ability will be very limited , which would be a disadvantage in this modern world. For example, modern companies wish to hire an individual who is a MBA with an engineering degree. This approach will add versatility and the individual would be able to do the work of both, a manager and a technician.

A common belief is that, ' a rolling stone gathers no moss'. This is true for people who don't want to work and look for easier alternatives.Frequent changes don't help in the long run. A change is necessary, but only at it's optimum time.

Thus , I personally believe that life is all about exploring new horizons and experiencing new things. Monotonous life becomes a burden. In life, change is essential for facing new challenges and not lagging behind due to fear.

Writing Feedback / IELTS-visitor/host? who should adapt for cultural differences [10]

topic-

SOME PEOPLE believe that visitors to other countries should follow local customs and behaviour. Others disagree and think that the host country should welcome cultural differences.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

answer-

Tourism industry has taken a big leap in the last few years. People visit different countries during vacations and also for official purposes. When an individual visits another country, sometimes cultural differences arise between them and the localites. It is said that the visitor must respect the local customs, while others debate that the host country should have some tolerance for cultural differences. However, its the moral duty of a visitor to change themselves according to the territory and culture they are visiting.

Host country most of the times welcome their guests with a big smile. Sometimes a foreign national might not be acquainted with the local customs and can make mistakes. When a host country welcomes any guest, they should also have the guts to forgive unintentional mistakes. For example, a lot of tourists come to visit the Golden Temple (India). It is a custom to cover the head inside the premises. If by chance, a foreigner doesn't covers his/her's , the local people should not feel offended and instead, should tell that foreigner the importance of covering the head. A host should show the required hospitality and enlighten the visitors about their customs and traditions.

However, the responsibility of the visitors should be greater than that of the host. When visitors go in foreign countries, they should adapt themselves according to the needs. They should be prepared , beforehand, not to hurt the sentiments of the locals. A country welcomes guests to promote cultural exchange, not to be insulted or having their culture polluted. When a visitor is visiting a country, they should read about the customs, traditions and other rules of that country and be prepared . For instance, some tourists go to western countries and throw their garbage anywhere on the streets or spit anywhere. This kind of behaviour is unacceptable. A visitor has no right to break the rules of a host country.

Unfortunately, the cultural differences result in clashes sometimes. It is the responsibility of both, hosts and visitors, to adapt themselves. However, a host might not be aware of the origin of the visitors. On the other hand, when a visitor can do the effort to go abroad, they should also do a little effort to learn about the region they are going. Nowadays, all the information is available on the internet. If a visitor is confused, they should humbly ask for guidance from the locals and should not behave rudely, which would hurt anyone.

Thus, I strongly believe that its the duty of a visitor to camouflage with the region. A host can tolerate minor mistakes, but intentional, disrespecting behaviours isn't acceptable.Tourism is to promote cultures and make others aware of the integrity and tradition of one's own country, not to get their cultures and sentiments , insulted and spoiled. Visitors must respect the cultures and behaviour of the host country.

Writing Feedback / IELTS-good news/bad news? whats the best? [2]

QUESTION:
News editors decide what to broadcast on television and what to print in newspapers. What factors do you think influence these decisions? Do we become used to bad news? Would it he better if more good news was reported?

ANSWER:

The development of science and technology has immensely helped keeping people updated about the world they live in. The credit of this awareness goes to the power of media. News has become a quintessential part of the routine and has a significant effect on the mass it connects to. Everyone wants to know what is going around the world.

However, the news shown daily is a sensitive task which needs meticulous efforts. Both electronic and print media have editors to make the final call. News editor's decision for showing a news depends on a lot of factors. The editor has to keep in mind the profit maximisation. The circulation and the TRP of a news is the most important factor. Also , the mass of people a news will connect to is also important. For instance, the news of Tom Cruise signing for Mission Impossible 4 flick is irrelevant for a villager. Thus every news targets a certain strata of the society.

Some wise man once said, "Evening news is one where they begin with 'Good Evening' , and then proceed to tell you why it isn't". As soon as one watches a news channel its always full of terrible things happening around. News channels show these bad news as they are very sensational and thrilling. Bad news keeps everyone interested and hence increases the circulation and TRP. However, too much of bad news makes us sceptical and paranoid. To create spicy news, paparrazzi intrude people's lives and also sometimes defame them. This kind of approach is not justified. People are becoming used to bad news because of all these sensational news.

Winston Churchill once said , " There is nothing as public opinion, there is only published opinion". The media can use their power to good effect. Good news creates optimism and peace and harmony. It can be used for social awareness and also for knowledge enhancement. However, in today's scenario , good news might not be very successful. It is not thrilling all the time. Good news gives inspiration but can not keep people, who seek spicy news, interested.

Thus, its the duty of the editor to keep a check on what they publish. News can misguide and inspire both, depending on what is published. The world is not a perfect place to live, bad things are ought to happen. But the media should take the responsibility of creating awareness for fighting the evils , and not spice up or manipulate the facts for their selfish purposes. The sole objective of media is social awareness and supporting the truth, this principle should be followed by every news channel or newspaper.

Writing Feedback / IELTS-do ads make us to buy more or is it a need? [4]

I haven't really done good work on this essay. Still all reviews are welcome.
question-

Today, the high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of the society in which they are sold.

To what extent do you agree or disagree?

answer-

All Humans desire to live an easy and smooth life, not having to do too much of hard work. Scientific and technological developments have resulted in creation of highly advanced equipments and better commodities. Media has played a very important role in promotion of these consumer goods like T.V., refrigerators, shampoos , computers ,soaps and so on. However , it is the human desires which has resulted in the high sales of these goods , irrespective of their prices and advertising.

Advertisements play an important role in promotion of any product. Media has reached every corner of the world. Right from a villager to a top industrialist , everyone knows the power of media. The advertisements give a real good kick start for launching any product. However, spending on advertising is not a guarantee for the success of a product. A product will be successful only if it meets the required standards.

The high sales of consumer goods is because it has become a necessity in life. Goods like T.V. , refrigerators, computers, etc., provide us with sophistication and convenience. The popular consumer goods were once considered as luxury, but now it has become a necessity. It is the need of the people which has promoted the sale of these goods. For instance, can we really imagine a world without television, computers, toiletries etc? These are the basic needs , one requires no guidance to know if they really need it or not.

Consumer goods are in high demand also because they are time saving and meet high standards. With more people doing jobs, it is very important to save time. Sophisticated devices save a lot of time and are easy to use. These consumer goods have become the heart of the modern society.

However, these developments have resulted in over-dependence on these goods. People rely too much on them and don't want to do any effort. But everything has its pros and cons. The amount of ease and facilities these goods give, surely over-shadows their disadvantages.

Thus , its the real need and desires of the people which has resulted in high sales of products. Advertisements can give initial advantage only, but can never make a low quality good successful in the long run. Modern lifestyle has resulted in making the consumer goods a necessity and people really need them.

Writing Feedback / IELTS- sporting events and their need for easing international tension [3]

TOPIC
Popular events like the football World Cup and other international sporting occasions are essential in easing international tensions and releasing patriotic emotions in a safe way.

To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

answer-

Time and again, nations across the globe are in a rat race to prove their world dominance and to claim territorial supremacy. The whole world is running blindly to amass arms and ammunition. This has resulted in a lot of tension among nations. Steps to ease this tension are very necessary. Sporting events have played a significant role to ease this tension.

Sporting events play a pivotal role in uniting the common public on one single platform. Lack of communication between people is also responsible for the tension. Winston Churchill once said ," There is no such thing as public opinion. there is only published opinion". The common people only say what they hear, which results in tension. However, these sporting events brings the hearts of the people together. People can meet and understand the ground realities of each other's nations during these sporting extravaganzas. People show the support for their countries in a more dignified and sporting manner in such events.

International events in the field of sports, also helps to renew bilateral ties between nations who are supposedly foes. It can result in a small, yet significant step for renewal of ties among nations and to promote cultural exchange and sporting tours.

For instance, international events like football World Cup , Olympics, Commonwealth games etc., bring all the nations together on a single platform, forgetting their enmity. Nations like , India-Pakistan, USA-Russia, North and South Korea participate in these events together to promote peace, sportsmanship and improve ties.

But these sporting events need a lot of investment , which is not easy for any country. However , considering the promotion of peace and releasing tension , this is a very small price to pay. In addition, sometimes during these sporting events, brawls and fights also occur. This should be dealt strictly to preserve the sporting spirit.

I firmly support for the promotion of these sporting events. Although they are not a complete solution to the tension, yet they have a significant effect. Step by step only a herculean task can be achieved and this is a very peaceful step.

Writing Feedback / IELTS-fatherhood ,motherhood or both? [2]

please read my essay all of you and give your honest opinion. THANKS

TOPIC
"Fatherhood ought to be emphasized as much as motherhood. The idea that women are solely responsible for deciding whether or not to have babies leads on to the idea that they are also responsible for bringing the children up."

To what extent do you agree or disagree?

MY ANSWER:

Parenting is a very complicated process. Perfection in this process is dependent on a lot of factors. Both mother and father play a vital role in raising a kid and it is the responsibility of both of them to cater the needs of a kid.

Some orthodox people believe that it is solely the duty of a mother for raising their offspring. However, this has now changed in the current scenario. Such an obsolete approach is useless in the modern society. Just because giving birth is the discretion of a woman does not mean that the father is allowed to relax and not look after the child.

The current world talks about women empowerment and children welfare. How will a child have a good upbringing when his mother is busy trying to maintain a balance between the home and the duties of a father? According to the social setup, it is the duty of a father to provide for the basic needs and financial security of the family. In addition to this, a father is also responsible for looking after the child.

For example , it is believed that a family in which a patriarch is absent, often results in their children being spoilt. This is supposedly true.

A mother is to give love, affection and proper manners to a child. On the other hand, a father should share the duty of inculcating discipline and etiquettes in a child. None of these duties can be actually categorised to a mother or a father. They both are equally responsible for raising a child.

I strongly believe that thrusting all the responsibilities on a mother , just because she has given birth , is a very narrow thinking and is void. A family needs a balance. Father and mother , both act as a fulcrum on which a child's future is built. They both are equally important and fatherhood should be emphasised as much as motherhood.