Essays / How to start: children of different levels of intelligence should be taught together [4]

Hi

can someone please help me I cannot write an essay on this following IELTS topic. Please give me some good suggestions I cant think of anything to write on this topic

It is widely believed that children of different levels of intelligence should be taught together, while others think that more intelligent children should be taught separately.

Discuss and present your own opinion.

Thankyou

Writing Feedback / 'Students are developing more and more interest in arts and literature' - ielts essay [4]

THESE DAYS PEOPLE PAY MORE ATTENTION TO ARTISTS (WRITTERS, PAINTERS AND SO ON) AND GIVE LESS IMPORTANCE TO SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY.
TO WHAT EXTENT DO YOU AGREE AND DISAGREE? WHAT IS YOUR OPINION?"

It is true that in resent years many people are developing more and more interest in arts and literature. At the same time, this attraction could cause many individuals to draw away from much more significant fields like science and technology. While I accept that this trend is increasing but in my opinion this can not stop people to do more researches and produce more technological inventions.

On one hand, rapid proliferation of technology has made human lives very hard and tough. For instance, with the invention of mobile phones, we are now in the approach of our employers all the time. They can call us and hand over office work at any time. Not only that with the advancement of technology people have become much more materialistic and worldly. This race of materialism is putting people under immense pressure and tension. To take a refuge from this tense and depressive world people are taking the support of writers and painters. These artists, with their creativity, take people to an imaginary world, away from their busy lifestyle and help them to calm their tiring nerves.

On the other hand, as we are living in the 21st century, where our lives are completely dependent on science and technology, the predilection for artists can not pull us away from science and technology. No doubt, paintings are very good remedy for a sombre sole, but science provides a real cure which can save lives. In past few years huge number of researches have been done to find the treatment of a lethal disease called cancer. Only science and technology have made its treatment possible. In addition, all the natural resources, which have made our lives easy, are now available to humans because of technology. For these reasons, advancements in these fields, especially in the field of genetic science will never stop

To recapitulate, I concede that the works of artists do have magnetic effects that is drawing attention, yet arts and literature do not solve many problems that the mankind is encountering today. The answers to these problems are given by science and technology and this factor will always attract people towards them.

Writing Feedback / Print and electronic media feeding us with information [2]

Topic It is becoming more and more difficult to escape the influence of the media on our lives.
Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of living in a media rich society.

In recent years the media, both print and electronic, has developed immensely. It is a form of communication which is feeding us with information from all corners of the world and not only that it is a form of entertainment as well. These are the main reasons that are causing the media to penetrate into our lives. Although, media has many advantages but at the same time it has certain drawbacks as well. In my opinion their are more disadvantages of living in a media rich society rather than its good effects.

The first detrimental effect of the media is that it is the major source of violence among the youth. Children watch violent sports like wrestling, watch violent and horror movies and the aftermath of such shows is that children try to do the same acts as done by their heroes and can seriously harm them selves and their fellow children too. Furthermore, now on television their are large number of channel options are available. Children come home from school and sit down in front of the television, hardly involve in physical activities or participate into face-to-face communication or share virtual and non virtual information. This lack of socialism can seriously affect a child's' confidence and communication skills.

The other equally important factor is that in the newspapers, on websites and during a television show too many advertisements are being shown, trying to convince the public to buy their products even if they do not need it. Many people too get attracted by these ads and waste their money on non competitive things.

However, their are few people who consider media's influence beneficial. They claim that media can be auxiliary while making decisions about many aspects of life, like politics. Through media different people give different opinions, giving us choice to decide what is right for us. In addition, internet has made the research process so efficient and simple that we cannot think of redeeming ourselves from this form of media.

To sum up, I concede that the influence of media can be effective in many ways but it is causing many harmful effects as well at an alarming rate. We are are living in 21st century where we are completely dependent on the media and we cannot remove it from our daily routines. The best way to control its influence is to limit its use.

Writing Feedback / 'The advantages of exam out ways its disadvantages' - Help for ielts essay [3]

Topic
Tests and examinations are a central feature of school systems in many countries.
Do you think the educational benefits of testing outweigh any disadvantages? Give reasons for your answer, and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience

In recent years there is a vast increase in discussions about how the examination systems should be at schools. Now students are undertaking too many tests and exams at school which do have many advantages both to the students and the teachers, but at the same time they also have certain drawbacks as well. The administration at schools need to think seriously about the outcomes of the examination systems they have, to test the students. In this essay I would like to give my own opinion after discussing both sides of the argument.

The first good thing about the exams and tests is that it is a method to test students how well they are learning from the lectures delivered in the class and how successful teachers are in conveying their knowledge. For instance, if a whole group of students shows poor grades in a subject then the teacher teaching that subject can be encouraged to work harder and improve his or her teaching skills to bring the students at the top. This is a strong point that favours the argument because teachers are the key figures in a school system and exams are mandatory to check their level of teaching.

The other, equally important factor in the favour of the issue is that exams encourage students as well to study, do more reading and writing and thus improving their general knowledge. If there are no exams and tests then students will not put any effort to learn and educate. Exams produces a state of terror that forces children to study. Moreover, exams bring students together, they do combine studies which help them to learn the essence of team work and they develop communication skill. Lastly, exams develop a sense of competition which also draws students towards books.

On the other hand, exams do have some disadvantages as well. The factor competition can be encouraging for some but it is a major factor that is causing immense pressure on the students and leading them to the state of depression. When students do not get good grades the are discouraged and at the same time they are forced, both by the teachers and the parents, to work hard putting them under more pressure. Now more and more students are involving in drug addiction to relieve from exam pressure.

To recapitulate, I concede that exams can be discouraging for the students in some ways but this does not mean that they should be removed from the system. The advantages of exam out ways its disadvantages. Students should be tested and then upgraded but at the same time weaker students should be given special help to improve.

Writing Feedback / 'work has become the most vital part' - help for ielts essay [NEW]

Topic
As most people spend a major part of their adult life at work, job satisfaction is an important element of individual wellbeing.
What factors contribute to job satisfaction?
How realistic is the expectation of job satisfaction for all workars

In the modern world, work has become the most vital part of an individuals' life. In order to do his work earnestly and successfully job satisfaction is mandatory. In its absence a worker can face arduous problems. When we discuss about job satisfaction we must consider which factors are responsible for it and how realistic they are for the employees

Firstly, a work place must provide a congenial and friendly environment. The colleagues must be helpful and cooperative. If the employers have welcoming attitude and good communication skills obviously this will automatically attract the employees and they can easily discuss all kinds of matters with their bosses.

Second of all, rewards and credits are few of the most pressing factors contributing to job satisfaction. Good pension schemes, pay raise, free medical facilities and monthly rewards for hardworking employees can make them work exceptionally harder and provide them mental gratification that their work is appreciated. Further, when a person works nine hours a day he must be given a proper break during working hours. Not only that they should be given reasonable numbers of holidays so that they can relax and develop their strength because "all work and no play makes the Jake a dull boy".

The list of factors responsible for job satisfaction will never end, because every person is different, has different way of thinking and has different needs. If one facility is rapturous for one individual, it may be disliked by others. Every company has to make decision realistic and within its financial constrains. On this score every factor cannot be practical.

To recapitulate, I concede that in today's everyone is involved in some kind of job. He/she must be provided with facilities to some extent which can satisfy each and every employee. At the same time workers should also be realistic because every wish cannot come true in the real world

Writing Feedback / 'change is a way of life and brings new colours in it' - IELTS essay [3]

Topic; some people prefer to spent their lives doing the same things and avoiding change. others, however, think that change is always a good thing.

We are living in a world encompassed with people from different walks of life. For some spending lives in a same manner has become idiosyncrasy, their lives are devoid of new things and experiences involving change. However, others think that change is a way of life and brings new colours in it. Let's have a debate on both of these issues.

Some people exclaim that if individuals spend their lives in one tone is because of various reasons. Some are very superstitious and ominous. They believe that if they acquire any change in ways, on which account they spend their lives, bad things will happen to them. Similarly, people attain their habits from their parents and to pay them respect and homage, children keep on reviving the same things and refrain their selves from any change.

However, critics argue that without indulging into change, our lives will become sombre and rueful. For instance, if a person does not involve in social communities for a change and he/she remains confined in his /her home and family, is more likely to lead a life full of contempt and depression.

Furthermore, we are living in a modern age, where technology has made our lives comfortable and easy. This was only possible because people had cordially welcomed the new inventions and if they did not have, then we shall be still living in Stone Age like aboriginal inhabitants.

After contemplating on both views, I conceive that every individual has his/her own disposition. If they believe experimenting with new things in life congenial, then they should pursuit for changes and if not then they should spend a monotonous life.

Writing Feedback / 'sportsmen are the ambassadors of a country' - IELTS essay [2]

Topic; Professional sportsmen should be paid a great deal of money. Some people feel it justified while others believe that is unjust to other professionals. Give your opinion.

In every corner of the world, sports industry is gaining immense popularity. Every individual has predilection for a certain sport. People gather from different areas to watch their favourites playing in the field. Who bring glory and rejoice to the people back at home. On this account it is considered, by some, that sportsmen should be highly paid. However, others refute this opinion and consider that every profession should be paid equally.

Cited by few people, sportsmen are the ambassadors of a country. They work done to dusk , epitomes of sporting profession, sacrifice their personal lives and dexterously avert the feelings of detest and rage, in people from countries which are suffering from internal war, into unity. Like in many African countries, in Somalia where groups of rebellions involved in terrorism, but when football world cup comes, every house in the country, on the face of every child you can see their national flag. Supporting their heroes vehemently, who represent their country in the world.

Similarly, actors and actress with their dandified affectations also earn equally great amount of money, but the essence of their work is not enough to fulfil the same duties as fulfilled by the sportsmen. For this reason they should be bestowed with large amount of money.

However, critics argue that other professionals like doctors, teachers, engineers, and policemen are the most important and vital pillars of a strong society, without each one of them a country will regress to an insufferable condition. There will be no law and order, people will cry for justice, upheaval of poverty, many prevalent diseases and no sign of development. Not only that, doctors work day and night to provide good health facilities and teachers provide literate citizens who can compete internationally to make their country economically stronger. A country can run without sportsmen but it will fall to the brink of destruction without illustrious professionals like teachers.

In conclusion, I concede that sports professionals are diligent and I esteem their efforts but it is unjust to pay them ample amount of money as compared to the other professions.

Writing Feedback / 'promote humanity and understanding among the people' - IELTS essay [NEW]

Topic;
Some people believe that visitors to other countries should follow local customs and behaviour. Other disagrees and thinks that the host country should welcome cultural differences.

What do you think?
Customs and traditions allude towards the uniqueness of a country. Their predecessors endeavoured to develop and preserve their culture and undoubtedly they represent the country in the world. On this behalf people consider their culture as national heritage and want to keep on reviving it by pursuing their old traditions. However, in my opinion most ardent welcome of new culture would be prudent and beneficial.

Firstly, I believe by learning about new cultures we can become much more tolerant and can bring harmony to the society because of more social understanding and less social conflicts. When we learn and imitate foreign customs, it can actuate the visitors for friendship and moreover proved to be auxiliary to apprehend their hopes and worries and help them to get through their difficulties and survive in a new locality.

Secondly, it is true that nothing defines a culture more than its language and it is also true that limits of my languages are the limits of my world. If I learn the visitors, it will not only bridge the communication gap between us but it will also broaden my future career perspective. Fpr instance by accomplishing the skills of English language can open many ways to educate in best universities of the world.

Thirdly, if foreign traditions are beneficial and congenial then they can become the part of the lives of the local dwellers. Take the example drinking Chinese tea with meals, basically it is warm water helps in digestion, surely by following this conduct of the visitors will not mask the local customs.

However, the opponents consider that "do in Rome as Romans' do". When visitors come to a foreign land they should respect the local traditions and to indulge in the local community, they must attribute their selves to the local customs.

Concluding, I firmly believe that to promote humanity and understanding among the people learning about cultural difference in compulsory.

Writing Feedback / IELTS - we should not let technology and make our lives simple? [5]

Topic: Technology is causing environmental pollution. Some believe that we should not technology and make our lives simple; while others believe that we should use it to control the problem. What is your opinion?

Technology is a blessing that has been bestowed upon us. Numerous eccentric discoveries have proved to be the felicity of the mankind and certain it is that they have made our lives comfortable. However, not everything is perfect; indeed technology does have some odious effects, like environmental pollution which we have to forbear. Pollution can be subdued, if we stop using the latest gadgets, but in my opinion technology can be auxiliary in controlling the pollution.

Firstly, if our lives are void of technology then we shall have the lives of primitive people, like those dwelt in the stone ages, trying to put on fire with stones, travelling hundreds of miles on foot taking weeks to reach their desired destination, no mobile phones, internet facilities, computers, making our learning and education slow. In addition to that our health system will be crippled without modern diagnostic process, operational technique and medication can give a way to various epidemic diseases especially AIDS. The strong intimacy of modern man with technology cannot allow him to live without it.

Secondly, scrupulous use of technology can help us to fight against the problem of pollution. For instance, the use of train engines running on electricity rather than the coal ones, proper disposal of garbage and it's recycling, clean sanitation system, all are made possible by technology.

Thirdly, if we do make our lives simple, the element of pollution will still be there. Burning of coal and woods is the most essential part of every inhabitant and this can most evidently destroy our ecosystem because of smoke and deforestation.

However, the opponents believe that we should be circumspect. We should not completely remove technology from our lives but decrease its utility, like walking to the nearer places instead of using cars.

Concluding, I concede that technology do have some draw backs but if we use it wisely then surly it can help us to control the problem of pollution.

Writing Feedback / 'the world of formidable evil, injustice and detest' - IELTS essay [6]

Topic
Some people believe that capital punishment should be legal while others refute this opinion. Do you agree or disagree

We are living in the world of formidable evil, injustice and detest. Crimes involving murders are flourishing on the bed of envy and hatred. In order to put an end to these acts of folly stringent measures should be taken, on the account of civilians' protection. Yet, what type of punishment should be given to the criminals, whether capital punishment or life time imprisonment, is a question needs to be answered. From my view point capital punishment is the answer.

Cited by a few people that death penalty is morally and ethically unjustified. A murder may be in self-defence or a juvenile conviction or involving a person falsely accused for it, giving such punishment to them will cause lose of innocent lives and leaving their relatives in disparity and grieving on the death of their loved ones.

However, it is exclaimed by the other group of individuals that to ensure the safety of the public and to reduce the crime rate in the society capital punishment is incumbent, since it has a deterrent effect. The thought of death penalty will prevail on the mind of the criminal and deliberately refrain him from the crime.

Moreover, in life time imprisonment various means of escaping can become possible. In many countries, bribery and internal corruption are making people with better fortunes and high connections to pay for their way out. Furthermore, to gratify the feeling of revenge and preventing more bloodshed, punishment of life-for-life will be prudent.

Concluding, I believe that for the benefit of the society and to keep the crime rate at the lowest level capital punishment should be mandatory.

Writing Feedback / IELTS essay if children should be sent to school at an early age? [6]

Topic
Children should be sent to school at an early age or they should be sent at the age of six or seven. Give your opinion?

Children are the building blocks of a country, their education structure should be constructed carefully to obtain the best results. To achieve the high standers in the learning process we must decide at which age children should be sent to school, whether early age or at a mature age of six or seven.

It is believed by some people that at three years of age children's brains are developing. They are much more eager to learn, have unbiased behaviour against different subjects, easier for the teachers to teach them discipline and co-operation which is difficult for the parents to teach at home, because at school a child is up-against larger number of students with whom he/she has to co-operate and get along with; while at home he/she owns everything.

At the age of six or seven, it becomes very difficult for the students to merge with the new environment because when they spend six years of pampered life at home, they find it hard to indulge with the new children. Moreover, many researches, especially in the field of language, have proved that better performances is seen in children, in learning a new language, who are going to school from a younger age because at three years a child can utter three or four words, so-forth it is easier for them to attain native fluency and make complex sentences.

However, the second group claims that six years is a much more mature age, at this age children behave positively towards education, make friends more sensibly and understand and respond to teacher's commands effectively.

Concluding, I concede that although there are benefits of sending children to school at six years but advantages of sending them at three are far more, in this way they will spend more years in learning process.