Writing Feedback / Whether it should be compulsory for high school students to wear uniforms or not - it's the question [5]

Some high schools require all students to wear uniforms. Other high schools permit students to decide what to wear at school. Which of these two school policies do you think is better. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion.

Whether it should be compulsory for high school students to wear uniforms or not has always been a bone of contention. Although freedom in clothing has its own benefits, I believe that obligatory uniform is the better policy, considering the immensely positive effects that it brings to both schools and students.

Many students nowadays prefer freestyle dressing as it creates a comfortable atmosphere, which is beneficial for their performance at school. Clothes are claimed to have a significant impact on people's mood. On wearing one's favorite outfits, that person feels more satisfied with him/herself and gain more self-confidence. Students, for that reason, can perform outstandingly at school thanks to the comfort and self-satisfaction brought on by their own clothes. Also, one's outer appearance can be a source of inspiration for another. Sitting in a classroom full of students wearing colorful outfits of different styles, one can easily get inspired by others and write a better essay or draw a nicer painting. It is true that freedom of choosing what to wear promotes mutual understanding. By judging their classmates through their clothing, one student can get a deeper overview of other's hobbies as well as habits.

Those in favor of uniformity at school state that dressing the same helps eliminate the gap between the rich and the poor, which can potentially reduce several school problems. To illustrate, it helps cover one's background, so there is little discrimination, leading to fewer cases of bullying and intimidation. Another reason is that it improves the school's aesthetic beauty, which tempts more boys and girls to attend the school. Teenagers, especially girls, are extremely concerned about their outer appearance, so stunning uniforms will be taken into serious consideration when it comes to choosing their future high school. Moreover, compulsory uniforms help promote discipline in class. A Special kind of clothing with badges and names contributes to developing a sense of pride and self-consciousness, preventing students from breaking the rules.

In conclusion, freedom in dressing to school has a good impact on students' academic performance and bring them closer together while compulsory uniforms reduce the number of offenses, improve discipline and become an attractive point of the school. Considering the current situation in such developing countries as our own, where class size is large and needs controlments, wearing uniforms is the optimal choice.

*I am preparing for exams and learning hard. I am very thankful for your reading my essay. Please make any correction or recommendation, as am longing for your feedbacks.

Writing Feedback / ielts- should we provide children in rural communities with more schools or computers [7]

In developing countries, children in rural communities have less access to education. Some people believe that the problem can be solved by providing more schools and teachers, while others think that the problem can be solved by providing computers and Internet access. Discuss both views and give your own opinion

The young in remote areas are facing up to several difficulties in the persuit of knowledge. While many people suggest that building schools and sending teachers to such regions are the best provision to be made to help them, others believe that aiding in technological devices such as computer and internet is the optimal solution. In my opinion, though each idea has its own benefits, the latter seems to be more potential and practicabe.

Establishing more schools and providing qualified teachers obviously have a good impact on improving student's quality in rural areas. This is because good provision of facilities such as laboratories , projectors and high-quality tables and chairs strongly motivates students to dig into the subject at school. By conducting experiments in science subjects as well as watching vivid images and videos, students enhance their knowledge more quickly and develop an interest to the subject. Also, better tutors can set as good examples, encouraging children to study more. To illustrate, frequent interaction with gifted teachers gives the young strong inspiration and excitement, thereby put more effort to studying so as to become as knowledgeable as their tutors. However, a large sum of money must be invested in education for good teachers and materials.

Petrsonal computer and internet access are beneficial for rural student for several reasons. Firstly, it is an immense source of information, far eclipsing textbooks in many aspects, such as new bakthrough in science or recent astronomy discoveries. Secondly, it is an effective way for self-studying. Children who are busy all day helping their parents can still keep learning at night with the companion of a computer.Though not having a chance to carry out experiments, they have a wider selection of videos to watch and can learn at their own pace. Another advantage is that the internet promotes correspontence with talented students all over the world. Students tend to learn from their peers, which means they can improve their academic performance more efficiently by exchanging information with online gifted students. The good point is, all of these benefits can be obtained within a small budget.

In conclusion,while building schools with good lecturers means a source of motivation and good exemplary, more knowledge is available for students on the internet and more academic cooperation with gifted friends are promoted there. Therefore, the best solution to low education standard in rural areas is to equip the young with computers and internet access.

Writing Feedback / More enhancements in security system due to the recent upsurge in the number of offences [6]

More and more measures to improve the security in the urban area have been introduced because of the increased crime. Do the benefits of the measures outweigh the drawbacks?

The authority is increasingly making more enhancements in security system due to the upsurge in the number of offences during recent years . In my opinion, the goodpoints of this approach far eclipse its drawbacks for several reasons

Firstly, this change in policy helps guarantee a secured life, improving life quality. Recent installament of CCTV and increase in patrolmen seem to have a positive effect in reducing crime rate. To illustrate, gangsters and murders that previously constantly posing a threat to many people's life no longer have any chance to commit a crime for fear of being recorded by the camera. Moreover, in case of emergencies, police tend to act more promptly, which saves several lives in gun-fightings. Therefore, people feel safer and have more satisfaction in life.

Another season that makes improving security the optimal solution is that it helps improve many key sectors in one country, especially the economy. This is because a safe living environment attracts a large number long-term residents. This, in the long run , will potentially lead to the establishment and thriving of several companies and corporations, bettering the economy.

However, opponents of this policy claim that it is excessively expensive the government cannot afford and there are other critical issues that are more urgent. This does not stand to reason as security is a long-term investment which is beneficial to bot the government and residents. Moreover,if we do not invest properly in it the consequences may be severe, which would definitely lead to more cost to cover. For example, recent chaos in some states of USA causes by insecurities is disturbing both the politic situation

In conclusion, the complaint about extravagance and uneffectiveness of spending on security system is groundless. For a better future, governments should have no hesitation in enhancing domestic security.

Writing Feedback / Government spending on the internet - is it the most appropriate use of money? IELTS task 2 [7]

Topic: in many countries the governments spend a large amount of money on improving internet access, Why and do you think it is the most appropriate use of money?

All around the world, extraordinary sums of money are being spent by several governments in order to obtain high-quality internet access. Although I agree that such spending is beneficial to the residents, I still think that money should be diverted into other fields such as scientific research or infrastructure.

Investing on the internet is important because it helps improve people's satisfaction and promote e-commerce. People, especially the young, are frequent internet users, who will inevitably feel delighted to be able to check e-mails and surf the web at a greater speed, or chat video with their friends without any interruptions. Moreover, better internet access can have a good impact on e-commerce- an integral part of every country's economy. This is because improvements in internet increase the quality and quantity of online-shopping, attracting a considerable number of online customers.

As beneficial as the internet seems to be, there are still other aspects of life that the authority should take into serious consideration. So as to improve people's living standard, problems relating to transportation must be solved. Infrastructural investment, for example, is extremely necessary as it directly affects every individual in society, rather than just one part of it like the internet. Therefore, governments should pay more to build more highways, reduce traffic congestion and road accidents as well as improve public transport system. Spending more on science is worthwhile as it not only widens human's horizon but also leads to the invention of more advances and conveniences in life. Several scientists and researchers with great brains are calling for funding in their projects, in returns they can make significant contributions to society, and it should be the government's responsibility to help them.

In conclusion, although the internet is important, spending on improving transport system and helping carry out research is a more plausible option. By doing this, the government can improve both individual's life quality and the country's future prospect.