EF_Sean
Jan 17, 2009
Writing Feedback / GRE essay (Science and Art) [2]
Your essay lacks focus. It is not particularly clear what your thesis is, or what sort of relationship, if any, you believe exists between science and art. Overall, though, you seem to be arguing that both science and art can have both stabilizing and destabilizing effects. If that is your thesis, you should include a statement to that effect in your introduction. Then, you would want to identify how science contributes to social society and how it destabilizes it. You sort of do this, but you have no clear topic sentences to unite your examples. You don't really explain how science has helped with population control, for instance, nor do you discuss why "the discovery of genetically modified organisms, the manufacture of synthetic vitamins, and other drugs" should be viewed as increasing the risk of diseases, given that the countries that have these technologies in abundance also have the highest life expectancy rates. Likewise, your examples for art are, as they stand, too glib to be convincing. You would need to go into much more detail for both, and identify a general principle that your specific examples demonstrate.
Some grammatical stuff, too:
"A society becomes less stable when people experience scarcity and are unable to acquire the things that provides physical comfort such as food, clothing, shelter, and technology."
"Overpopulation and economic crises are closely linked. "
"Advances in research play a significant role, for instance in the control of population" A role in what? Overpopulation? Economic crises? The management of these?
Your essay lacks focus. It is not particularly clear what your thesis is, or what sort of relationship, if any, you believe exists between science and art. Overall, though, you seem to be arguing that both science and art can have both stabilizing and destabilizing effects. If that is your thesis, you should include a statement to that effect in your introduction. Then, you would want to identify how science contributes to social society and how it destabilizes it. You sort of do this, but you have no clear topic sentences to unite your examples. You don't really explain how science has helped with population control, for instance, nor do you discuss why "the discovery of genetically modified organisms, the manufacture of synthetic vitamins, and other drugs" should be viewed as increasing the risk of diseases, given that the countries that have these technologies in abundance also have the highest life expectancy rates. Likewise, your examples for art are, as they stand, too glib to be convincing. You would need to go into much more detail for both, and identify a general principle that your specific examples demonstrate.
Some grammatical stuff, too:
"A society becomes less stable when people experience scarcity and are unable to acquire the things that provides physical comfort such as food, clothing, shelter, and technology."
"Overpopulation and economic crises are closely linked. "
"Advances in research play a significant role, for instance in the control of population" A role in what? Overpopulation? Economic crises? The management of these?
