Writing Feedback / Childcare centers provide the best services for children of pre-school age [2]

Some parents think that childcare centers provide the best services for children of pre-school age. Other working parents think that family members such as grandparents will be better cares for their kids. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

For some reasonable thought, some parents consider that childcare is believable place taking care their children, while working parents believe that caring from extended family is better than any places for children. I personally agree kin care is reliable.

the appearance of day care centers promises parents for placing their children. It is because those centers have fully-trained staff who got involved into a training center. The recent studies of Queen University announced that both the improvement of day care request and certified staff of baby sitter have grown dramatically in the last three years. In reverse, I doubt that taking children to day care is a smart choice, because it is well-known for a highly paid service and also rumor of abuse has spread widely.

Abusing is far from kin care, and it is believable because caring from extended family such as grandmother provides emotional bounding to their own blood. My nephew, Joel, often was told as a silent baby during the day in the day care. It was unreasonable because family recognised him as a playful boy at home, but when the grandmother was willing to take care him, he became a cheerful boy as before. This results a proven that cares from family members have huge support for children behavior.

In conclusion, certified nurture from babysitter in the childcare centers is not a guarantee our child will be saved from harmful things such as abuse, but I strongly believe that nurtured by family member naturally provides better both safety and love for children of pre-school age.

Writing Feedback / I believe that the worries to quit job appears, thus staying many years in a company is reasonable. [NEW]

Do you agree that money is the only motivation at work why people prefer working in the same company for many years?

Many people are not keen on changing work. While some reasons that it is due to money expectation, I completely disagree to that argue.

working in the same place for long-term period has some valuable merits for future. It might be pension or facilities such as insurance will be arranged by how many years the employee has been staying in the company. This was happened few year ago to my late grandfather, when he worked in Good Year about 35 years. The time he got 65, company provided him pension. Not only pension, but a home, life-time insurance, and monthly support to be enjoyed until the rest of his life.

It is undeniable that looking for a new job in order to get another better one has thousand of challenges and possibility of failure. This view can be seen that most of the companies reduce their employees due to the economic problems which is happening globally. Last updated news from The New York Times, for instance, announced that there might be hundreds of employee should be rested home because of dramatic fall of profit which is followed by a highly paid outcomes. With this view, I believe that the worries to quit job also appears, and staying many years in a company is reasonable.

In conclusion, not only the motivation of money of pension or facilities given by company takes part to have no intentions to achieve other careers, but also the minimal chance to reach a new job involves.

Writing Feedback / Studying art for some students is fun, but many are having problem with it... [3]

It is pointless making children who lack artistic talent learn painting and drawing in Art classes at school. Instead, they should concentrate on other creative and practical subjects which they may have more aptitude. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

In many schools, common argues appear that attending classes that children have disliked, or they lack of certain talents such as painting or drawing, it does not need further study to those subjects. While schools think that focusing children to aptitude for practical and creative subjects should be concentrated. I completely agree that involving children to the lack subject is useless, and it is valuable to improve child's ability.

Focusing our children into their personal aptitudes in academic performance enhances their abilities. By doing subjects that students are mostly like, they will have more regular time to repeat practices the creativity, and by repeating material improves quality of lesson achievement to students. Recent researches from Queen University mentioned that the exploration going further to lesson had increased to 1000 students who were analyzed during 6 months. with this view, I believe that it is compulsory to locate children to their aptitudes.

Studying art for some students are fun, but many are having problem with it. It is because making art such as painting, drawing or music need deeply imagination. Visualizing something that students cannot see will be becoming a tension and stress. Queen University studies revealed that stress coming to students 56% has come from their lack of interest in Artistic lessons, because they should imagine things or places cannot be seen. I believe that pressing our children to certain subjects that they are not keen on going is pointless.

In conclusion, I completely agree to the idea that attending children to lesson they lack is not meaningful, but getting further to other creative and practical lessons should be involved.

Writing Feedback / It is only fair that people who wish to smoke should have to leave the building. [NEW]

In some countries it is now illegal to smoke in public places. It is only fair that people who wish to smoke should have to leave the building. Do you agree or disagree?

Smoking has special concern in many countries. Some have banned smoking activity in public areas such as bus or train stations, but critics argue that smoking does not a crime that should be banned. While smokers think that giving distance while doing smoking is fair enough, I also agree not to ban smoking, because health is absolutely personal concern.

Societies around the world have concerned to the health diseases influented by smoking. Smoking actively or the people close to smoker can develop cancers such as mouth, lung and other parts of our body. Recent research from Queen University found that the chemical subtances in the smoke is becoming the main threat to the citizens health, and it is a must to government to ban smoking especially in public areas. However, I think that using masker in public area can be good for citizen. It is because I believe that smoking has any positive sides to the smoker that also need to be respected, and it is personal decide to do smoking or not.

For some people, they are keen on smoking due to sensation of relax. Active smokers argue that doing smoking is helping them to decrease daily stress. People who are working 8 hours in labour believe that smoking 5 minutes can release exhausted through the day, especially when they do after lunch time. With this idea, I think that seems not fair to people to ban their right of getting relax. However, I completely agree that smoker need to take some distance from people around them as a respect of society health.

In conclusion, it is win-win solution for both society and smoker to advice smoking activity in certain place or leave the building, and I believe that making smoking illegal is an overreaction decision.

Writing Feedback / Moving fabrics to suburb areas - should we care more for their profits or for our environment? [2]

In some countries, governments are encouraging industries and businesses to move to regional areas outside the big cities. Do the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages?

Government encouragement to move industry and business into suburb appears nowadays in many countries. While this is considered merits are likely to achieve further, some demerits should be considered primarily.

For companies, moving from big cities are chance to decrease costs and improve profits. To improve profits, build low cost landmark and having larger area to expand the production are the first step would be taken. Research from Queen University to The Good Year, for instance, while their landmark building had moved from the capital city of Indonesia to several province,they had advance the profit up to 35% per year. However, expanding companies to suburb will close opportunity to society to have green space. Further, sooner or later pollution toward stress in indigenous people will be increasing.

Approaching industries to move to regional areas will be a trigger of chaos on the main road. Stress on their main roads will be placed of employee who are going to work or coming home. Long time ago, Bandung was popular as a comfortable place to have vacation because of its large space field, but when we go there today, it is not a lovely place anymore, because it can be seen that people are busy both road and pedestrian.

In conclusion, government should reconsider to place industrial and business to regional areas. It is needed to keep going nature grows as the best place to visit or live without stress.

Writing Feedback / Getting new job and having interview are linked as a common way within companies. [2]

Please note that the next time you provide a useless comment in other student's thread, your account will be suspended.

Most employers interview candidates before hiring them. Do you think this is the best way to do it? In your opinion, what is the best method for choosing employees?

Getting new job and having interview are linked as a common way within companies. While most companies or employers think it is efficient to get best candidate, I believe some methods should be considered further.

To some people who have relation major of communication with people, interview might work well, but for some are not. There will be nervous before having the meeting to interviewer, and it is possible that a candidate will not perform satisfy answers. For example, when my first interview to teach in a school, a week before, I already got worries for questions might be coming, and I got fever and stress during a week before meeting the principle for interviewing. However, aptitude test and writing essay might be the answers better than giving interview.

Aptitude tests are delivering candidate to show how qualified someone is within the academic, and writing essay can be seen as valuable because employers can analyze the strength and weakness points in public knowledge and social interest. Recent studies reported by Queen University said that 70% of 1000 candidates agree that they are prepared well to getting aptitude test and writing essay, and those tests are helpful method to get a new job in 2014. With this kind of tests, I believe nervous and worries can be decreased within candidates

In conclusion, interview can be successful to certain people who have communication skill only, and for the remaining sharing intelligences by aptitude test and writing essay are valuable method to be done.

Writing Feedback / Affection for color and buying influence for some manufactures and retail companies is prioritized [2]

Colour is a powerful tool that is used to great effect by manufactures and retail companies when they try to sell us something. In fact, many of the purchasing decisions we make are partly or largely influenced by colour. How true is this statement? How much does colour influence us when we buy something?

Affection for color and buying influence for some manufactures and retail companies is prioritized. Although it is true for some critics, I would argue that quality and popular brand sides are more influential.

It is argued that the color effect plays main role in the will of buying among the customers. This comment has been analized by researchers how the prediction of improving selling in women wear in a shopping mall. A branded company named Logo, for instance, which has been popular with quality and the high price faced that the woman jeans have been sold cheaper in the fake markets. Logo looks this view not as thread of decreasing the company, because company found that some cheap jeans can be looked from the quality, and it is embarrassing for woman to have the fake jeans.

Undoubtedly, the bright color could deliver customers to happy feeling of shopping. It is because certain colour is believed such a treatment influencing buyers especially to mothers and girls. In the online selling like lazada.com, for instance, predicted that their selling would not perform as popular as nowadays due to competitors in the shopping mall, but colorful and looked like a luxury good, lazada.com is accepted and popular due to their stylish colour. In reverse, I believe that quality and popular brand are essential more than colour power.

In conclusion, although colour has great influence to customer, but manufactures and retail companies should consider quality and popularity of products.