EF_Sean
Aug 18, 2009
Writing Feedback / Criminal records, British and Australia laws - IELTS Essay [9]
Your arguments aren't very strong, and you make no attempt to address any of the counter-arguments.
Really? A single sentence added to the trial, say, "The defendant has been convicted of rape three times before," is going to overwhelm the jury?
This is an argument against trial by jury, not against releasing criminal records of defendants.
This is a somewhat stronger argument, and the main reason for the current policies. The idea is that a person should be found guilty or innocent based on the facts of the case, not on past history that may be irrelevant to the case. However, you need to deal in some way with the obvious counterargument, which is that past behavior is the surest predictor of future behavior, and that a person's propensity to commit crimes is in fact relevant in assessing his likely guilt.
Your arguments aren't very strong, and you make no attempt to address any of the counter-arguments.
One consequence of offering juries the information to the defendant's criminal background is overloading the juries with information
Really? A single sentence added to the trial, say, "The defendant has been convicted of rape three times before," is going to overwhelm the jury?
They are not equipped with the knowledge to sort out a huge amount of information thrown upon them.
This is an argument against trial by jury, not against releasing criminal records of defendants.
Another reason to prohibit such action is to prevent the defendant from being judged two times for a same crime.
This is a somewhat stronger argument, and the main reason for the current policies. The idea is that a person should be found guilty or innocent based on the facts of the case, not on past history that may be irrelevant to the case. However, you need to deal in some way with the obvious counterargument, which is that past behavior is the surest predictor of future behavior, and that a person's propensity to commit crimes is in fact relevant in assessing his likely guilt.