Writing Feedback / (IELTS essay) International tourism creates tensions in the host country [9]

Nowadays, international tourism is the biggest industry in the world. Unfortunately, international tourism creates tensions rather than understanding between people from different cultures. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

As a result of advancement in technology and globalization, the number of people moving between countries are surging now. It leads to a hot debate, weather it beneficial or create tensions in the host country. In my perception, it may leads to tensions if not handled well.

Tourism is the movement of people from one part to another and businesses related to it. International tourism brings enormous benefits to the host country. It opens the door of employment opportunities in service industries like, hotel, transportation and so on. It broadens our mind and helps to understand diverse culture. It enables foreign currency inflow and economic developments.

Apparently, a foreign tourist bring some problems with them that can leads to stress and dislike for local people. Undoubtedly, a foreigner is vulnerable and often ripped off by locals. Another point is that, the language barrier can lead to misunderstandings. Tourist sometimes refused to buy things from local market. Their bargaining may results in dispute between them, which ends up in dislikes. Furthermore, spending a short period in another country or with foreign tourists is not enough to understand fully about an alien culture

Most importantly, countries and societies have specific beliefs, traditions and culture. Foreign visitors may mistakenly act contrary to local norms, or they just plain offensive. For instance, special dress code and mannerism are there to enter inside the traditional temple in India. If a foreigner refused to follow this, it may consider as disrespect to the local culture. Therefore, some people think tourist insults local beliefs. Additionally, the wealth of the foreigners can cause envy and resentment. Besides, youngsters may be easily influenced by the bad social practices like alcoholism, of the foreigner.

In conclusion, global tourism is favorable to host country in various ways. At the same time, it can generate a large number of issues. If not handled well, it may pave way to tensions in the host country.

Writing Feedback / (IELTS essay) MNC's are good or bad..? [3]

Multi-national companies nowadays find it convenient both to market their goods all over the world. They set up production facilities wherever they find it suitable. In this essay, I will discuss why I fell multi-national companies have adverse effects on our lives.

Firstly, it spoils the local business and the livelihood of the local people will be in danger. Multi-national companies attract people first by giving cheap and wide range of products. The tight competition from large companies obliged local companies with fewer resources to move out of business. After capturing the market, they may decide the product and its price, leads to less choice and high price of the commodities. People forced to choose whatever available there, as it became the only one showroom there.

Secondly, they may results in the loss of cultural diversity. Undoubtedly, multi-national companies and globalization are making societies more open and identical. If people follow diversity and consume varied products, wherever they live, then only societies will be varied more. As multi-national companies flourish everywhere, it is possible to buy the same products from identical multi-national super markets or outlet around the globe. For instance, it is easy for anybody anywhere, to enjoy KFC by visiting the regional outlet of KFC.

Thirdly, we have become more vulnerable on them, which in turn make us more susceptible to their decisions. The availability of a product, price rate, hours of duty, facilities for employees, outlet locality, and so on, will directly affected by their rules. For instance, a multi-national company decides to move its production facilities to another country or to cut down the wages and benefits of employees, against the governmental policy, according to the company's regulations, it may create critical impacts.

To conclude, I believe that, multi-national companies cause unfavorable effects in peoples' lives. Governments should protect the local market and business from excessive outside competition. However, proper planning and effective rules can diminish its adverse effects to an extent.

Writing Feedback / ( IELTS essay) foreign visitors should be charged more? [5]

In many places, foreign visitors are charged more than locals when they visit cultural or tourist attractions. To what extend do you agree or disagree?

Tourism is one of the emerging industries in the world. The policy of charging more from foreigners than local people, viewed as discrimination by so many people while others accept it as being fair. In this essay, I will explain both views and say why I generally agree with foreigners paying more to visit cultural or historical sites.

On the one hand, charging more from the international tourists has many drawbacks. It irrational to charge much more, from foreigners because of their nationality. Nobody likes to pay more for the same thing. Besides, it will affect the peoples' travelling experience negatively. For instance, a foreigner should pay more money and suffer local peoples' harsh behavior by standing in the quae to visit a historical monument may spoil the enjoyment of the total trip. Moreover, the inequality in price will degrade the reputation of the local business, which in turn spoils the tourism industry. Tourist demands for the maximum enjoyment of their money. To compensate with the extra payments, they may become more selective in spending their budget on local markets. It further ruins the business. Once the tourist realize that the cost is high compared with other countries they may choose destination in other countries.

However, there are good reasons why oversea visitors should pay more. Firstly, it is expensive to maintain these tourist attractions. Tourists who are wealthier than the locals, visiting once in their lifetime should compensate to the cost of maintenance by spending few more dollars. Most importantly, if you are dreamed in your whole life to visit India's Taj Mahal, then you should ready to spend a little more for this experience. Secondly, a small increase in charge will not affect their budget. Thirdly, locals paid a lot from their salary as taxes for its maintenance. Lastly, the attraction of a cultural site is part of the local community's history and heritage. They should not pay to learn about their history.

In conclusion, it is important to meet money to maintain the cultural heritages. Local people should try to keep up a good reputation and wise use of their resources. I believe that, charge a little more from the foreign visitors is justifiable.

Writing Feedback / (IELTS essay) disappearing languages good or bad? [6]

Many languages are disappearing every year. Is this is a bad thing or could have fewer languages help bring people together.

Globalization and liberalization made the world to shrink into the size of a village. Unfortunately, this means that smaller languages are in danger of extinction. Some people fear the loss of cultural identity, while others believe that the world with less language is better. In this essay, I will explain why I feel that we should preserve local languages.

Language is the main tool of communication between people. A community's language is bond up with its culture and identity. Therefore, it may be difficult to preserve one without another. Secondly, the loss of diversity may also deprive us of different ways of looking at the world. Thirdly, when an unwritten and unrecorded language disappears, it is a loss of science. Rapid reduction of world's language is making it increasingly hard to trace when and how people involved. Lastly, fewer languages do not necessarily mean better communication. As more people speak one language, it became easier for billions to be influenced by shallow media or aggressive politicians.

However, there might be a lot to be gained from having fewer languages. People feel, unity, equality and encourage economical development. Besides, it may reduce the problem of translation, reduce misunderstandings, speed up travel between countries, and boost business. Other major problem is marginalization. Communities who do not speak a major world language may fall behind in science, technology and their economies suffer. Another point is that having less languages might mean more shared ideas. Global collaboration could happen instantly rather than taking years. Although some people are afraid of the loss of culture and identity, it seems that, good ideas can survive. For instance, we are not speaking Latin or Greek, the values of their philosophers are remained with us.

To conclude, diversity is the beauty of the nature. After analyzing both sides, I feel that, dying small languages is not a good trend. Therefore, let us try to keep these minority languages as a part of this diversity.

Writing Feedback / (IELTS essay) high payment for sports professionals is fair or not [2]

Successful sport professionals can earn a great deal of money than people in other important professions. Some people think it is fully justified while others think it is unfair. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

The world of sport is a multimillion-dollar industry. Recently successful sport professionals can earn enormous amount of money than other peoples who contributes their efforts in various other important fields, like teachers, scientists, doctors and so on. Some argue that these huge salaries are highly justified, while others deem it as unfair.

On the one hand, various professions contribute to making our world run more smoothly. Doctors put at least 5 years of study and internship. There work save lives. Teachers educate and inspire young people and their efforts produce responsible citizens of tomorrow. These people are vital part of our society. Nevertheless, these professionals struggle to meet both ends to meet, despite of their meaningful and critical contributions to the world.

On the one hand, sport is considered as a professional career, in which the top few players should rightly earn high salaries. They achieve fame and money by dint of their constant hard work and determination. Athletes train vigorously from an early age to become peak performers in their field. In course of training, they suffer injuries, even become disabled. They have to face tremendous pressure in each game, match or competition. Risky professions need high return.

Besides, their carrier is rather short and expensive. They compromise their personal lives and lose their privacy. I believed that, money is one form of recognition of their skills and dedication. Moreover, their achievement brings honor and attention, not only to themselves, but also to their teams, cities or countries. They inspire and entertain millions of people. Successful sport personalities encourage business in several ways. Additionally, some sports men often participate in social voluntary activities and support charity organizations to finance more fund.

In conclusion, it is true that our society places more value on sport, than on more indispensible professions and achievements. Personally, I think that, the amount of money, which sports starts makes, is justified as an honor to their hard work and dedication behind their victory, because unlimited talents should be rewarded unlimitedly.