Graduate /
Why do I want to pursue Coastal Science and Policy? My passion for marine conservation [7]
I can only comment on the content and not on the flow because you did not present it in essay form, which would have my reviewing job easier. Unfortunately, you chose an ill effective method of presentation, which means I will only offer you the advice applicable to the format you chose. How you connect the paragraphs, will be solely up to you. You will have to develop the transition sentences and paragraphs. I cannot help you with that because of the Q&A format that you chose to present your response as.
1. What you are showing is not a passion. It is only a development of your interest. A passion should show how you were spurred to do something, no matter how simple, in response to the devastation you saw. A passionate person would have emerged from the exposure with an idea of how to solve the problem in his own way. The passion should be felt and read in an over all, implied manner in the whole essay.
2. The first paragraph is a tired definition of sustainable science and policy. That is the standard response that everyone who applies for this course gives. Try to look within you for your personal definition. Don't go for textbook responses that will not help the essay stand out. One way that you can make this response stand out is by attaching the importance of sustainable science and policy to the situation in the beach areas of Mumbai. Give a personal insight regarding the effects of over-fhishing and how natural sources must be preserved in order to make sure that the natural sea sources are preserved for generations to come. Your policy ideas will help make this paragraph stand out.
3. Your response is not appropriate. You are not being asked to discuss what you learned as a member of WTI, you are are being asked to discuss a specific marine conservation policy or coastal science regulation that you feel is overlooked but is of vital importance to protecting the marine environment. What sort of strategic marriage of analysis, expertise, and policy attracted you to the course? Use a specific rule or instance. YOu should not discuss what you expect the program to provide for you at that point because that is not part of the prompt question. Offer only answers related to the questions being asked. Do not be generic and hope that it fits the question. Research. Look for specific policies you can cite in response to the question in order to add authority to your response.
4. Your career aspirations could use a method of development in its presentation. What agency do you hope to join after completing the program in relation to your career aims? How do you see yourself helping the coastal regions of India over the first 5 years of your career? How far do you hope to progress in terms of career networking to make these a reality? For example, After graduation, I plan to join xxx where I can effect a change in 2x. 3 years down the line, I should be working as a liaison officer at ccc agency where I will influence the xxxx. After 5 years, my positions as a vvvv will prepare me for a PhD level of study in bbbb.
5. If Sajan is not writing you a recommendation letter, don't include his name as a reference in the essay. He may not be able to support your claim of knowing him if you don't have permission to mention him. Even if you don't mention him, your belief in the program and how it aligns with your goals is enough to prove your interest in the program.
6. Your documents should prove your leadership abilities. There is no reason for you to repeat that in response to the question. You need to show a familiarity with the program that will prove that you can be trained for a specific leadership role by the program. Which subjects can do that? What training or internship? What collaborations does the university offer which will mold you into the authority you hope to become? Prove that you know what the course demands of you and that you are capable of delivering the requirements in order to complete the program.
7. Your final response does not stand out. There is no remarkable achievement present on your end that will tell the reviewer that you are better qualified than the other candidates. Your achievements are too general and could be attributed to every other candidate applying for admission. You need a stand out accomplishment in this section to prove that you are a one in a million kind of student who will add to the importance, visibility, and renown of the program. How can you, as a student, help to improve the current quality of the program and how can you be of important use during your time as a student and thereafter? Your response to these questions will help your candidacy stand out from the pack.