yang
Dec 5, 2009
Essays / Argumentative essay about global warming (two conflicting views) [11]
Yes, actually, our annotated bibs are supposed to be:
summary
what you agree/disagree
how does this source support your thesis (the reader HAS to know exactly how you are going to use this source)
Basically, I use part of some of the sources (not like taking a couple of words and twist the critic's meaning, but actually conforms to that critic's point) and use them in my essay.
I think that in using the sources, the writer basically has to know exactly what he/she's going to talk about and use the sources in accordance, so it doesn't really matter which comes first, the research paper or the bibs. I realize just now that it would be easier to do the bibs so that you don't have to reread the sources when it comes to writing the paper. I guess that last time, I was really pressed on time and simply started the research, then went back and paraphrased the research to do the bibs (awkward... it was supposed to be the opposite)
Read 5 articles by people who analyzed it, and tell all the stuff they say that supports YOUR argument!
Yes, actually, our annotated bibs are supposed to be:
summary
what you agree/disagree
how does this source support your thesis (the reader HAS to know exactly how you are going to use this source)
You can use almost any article to support your argument, as long as you interpret it strategically
Basically, I use part of some of the sources (not like taking a couple of words and twist the critic's meaning, but actually conforms to that critic's point) and use them in my essay.
I think that in using the sources, the writer basically has to know exactly what he/she's going to talk about and use the sources in accordance, so it doesn't really matter which comes first, the research paper or the bibs. I realize just now that it would be easier to do the bibs so that you don't have to reread the sources when it comes to writing the paper. I guess that last time, I was really pressed on time and simply started the research, then went back and paraphrased the research to do the bibs (awkward... it was supposed to be the opposite)