EF_Sean
Sep 21, 2009
Writing Feedback / My Essay on Disappearances in Pakistan. Help [3]
Already I have a horrible feeling about this essay. Of course Pakistan has been shaped by its history, every place is.
Better. At least the content is substantial. But it's also a sentence fragment.
You are going to need to define what you mean by bad governance, here.
Again, some explication and nuance might be in order. Surely you are not going to be ethnocentric and judge a culture negatively just because it oppresses over half its population. Fiend!
This seems like a gross oversimplification. Dictators oppress their people and terrorize their opponents. That's sort of their nature.
LOL! No, the best option would be for God to reach down and smite the wicked rulers of that nation. It's about as likely to happen, too, as what you propose. Naivete is not a great attribute in a poli. sci. student.
Overall, your essay seems a bit shallow and naive. Your main idea is that Pakistan doesn't respect human rights and that this is bad. Both parts of that are perfectly true, but it doesn't really require a full length essay to convince anyone of it. Moreover, all of your sources come from one end of the political spectrum, ("The Guardian," "Amnesty International," "Asian Human Rights Commission," etc.) This perhaps explains the confusion of your ideas, and why, in an essay on Pakistan, you manage to work in a "George W. Bush and America bad" paragraph.
Don't get me wrong, Pakistan is a U.S. ally, and has been able to get away with a lot of abuses without facing much criticism as a result. You probably could even make a case that the U.S.'s actions in the War on Terror have undermined its moral authority to criticize such abuses, and even made it easier for friendly dictators to engage in them. But you don't make this case. You simply repeat political talking points picked up from a handful of websites.
If this were a paper for an English class, you'd be fine. I would hope, though, that a poli. sci. prof would have higher standards for an essay on this subject. Try reading more books and journal articles on the subject, and at least get an idea of why the notion of the U.N. Human Rights Council forcing Pakistan to do anything is laughable.
Pakistan has been shaped by its history - both pre-Islamic and Islamic.
Already I have a horrible feeling about this essay. Of course Pakistan has been shaped by its history, every place is.
Colored in particular by it's troubled and blood-soaked birth as an independent nation in 1947 (Christophe Jeffrelot 2002: 151) with British India divided into India and Pakistan.
Better. At least the content is substantial. But it's also a sentence fragment.
which has led to extremely bad governance of the nation.
You are going to need to define what you mean by bad governance, here.
Combining this with the religious beliefs of the people especially those beliefs about women, homosexuality and expression puts gender discrimination and social injustice at an extreme high.
Again, some explication and nuance might be in order. Surely you are not going to be ethnocentric and judge a culture negatively just because it oppresses over half its population. Fiend!
Pakistan's increase of these 'incommunicado detentions' are due to its joining of the US-led so called "War on Terror"
This seems like a gross oversimplification. Dictators oppress their people and terrorize their opponents. That's sort of their nature.
The best option would be to have The Human Rights Council intervene immediately to ensure that the government of Pakistan improves its horrendous human rights record, face up to their actions and acknowledge and investigate every case of enforced disappearance and hold those responsible to account.
LOL! No, the best option would be for God to reach down and smite the wicked rulers of that nation. It's about as likely to happen, too, as what you propose. Naivete is not a great attribute in a poli. sci. student.
Overall, your essay seems a bit shallow and naive. Your main idea is that Pakistan doesn't respect human rights and that this is bad. Both parts of that are perfectly true, but it doesn't really require a full length essay to convince anyone of it. Moreover, all of your sources come from one end of the political spectrum, ("The Guardian," "Amnesty International," "Asian Human Rights Commission," etc.) This perhaps explains the confusion of your ideas, and why, in an essay on Pakistan, you manage to work in a "George W. Bush and America bad" paragraph.
Don't get me wrong, Pakistan is a U.S. ally, and has been able to get away with a lot of abuses without facing much criticism as a result. You probably could even make a case that the U.S.'s actions in the War on Terror have undermined its moral authority to criticize such abuses, and even made it easier for friendly dictators to engage in them. But you don't make this case. You simply repeat political talking points picked up from a handful of websites.
If this were a paper for an English class, you'd be fine. I would hope, though, that a poli. sci. prof would have higher standards for an essay on this subject. Try reading more books and journal articles on the subject, and at least get an idea of why the notion of the U.N. Human Rights Council forcing Pakistan to do anything is laughable.