Writing Feedback /
To reduce accidents number the council of Balmer Island should limit renting of mopeds; GRE argument [2]
The main problem that I see in your argument essay is that you have a hard time structuring your paragraphs to contain questions rather than statements. While you were supposed to be presenting and analyzing the possible questions that could be raised during the discussion of moped reduction, you presented responses to the questions in your mind rather than analyzing the possible question. There is also a part where you repeated phrases twice, no doubt because you are writing under time pressure. The conclusion could have been better developed if you had presented some information regarding the support that people have for the measure to reduce moped use on Balmer and then opposing it by saying the author had some good points in his report that should be considered when debating the issue. Since this is a GRE essay, try to avoid including yourself int he reference to people giving an opinion. Your job in the essay is to analyze the opinions, not give your own. You must also make sure to use the same keyword terms as in the original prompt. In this case, the word is MOPEDS NOT MOPES. As for the grammar corrections...
While it may be true that reducing the number of
mopesrent on RENTABLE MOPEDS DURING THE summer seems to reduce the number of accidents on Balmer Island,
but this author's argument does not make a cogent case for the decreased number of accidents on Seaville and Balmer Island. It is easy to understand that
this THESE cities can have differences in THE number of population and
fiscalization RENTAL RATES which differ the magnitude of the
increasing of INCREASE IN accidents.
The article states that the reduction in accidents on Balmer Island would be the same
of the AS THAT OF Seaville. Lets suppose that Seaville is a city larger than Balmer, people would
people would ride
mopes MOPEDS more frequently.
Consequently AS A RESULT, the number of
acicidents ACCIDENTS would increase WHEN compared
with TO a smaller city where
mopes MOPEDS are not used in everyday life.
Besides that, lets suppose THERE IS ALSO A LACK OF ASSUMPTION REGARDING the streets and roads of Seaville. ARE THE SEAVILLE STREETS
were more dangerous, with a lot of curves or streets with tiny sidewalks
. ?
We just do not know THOSE ARE UNKNOWN CONTRIBUTING FACTORS. Unless the two cities
would have the same size and pattern of roads and streets we
could CANNOT ACCURATELY say the comparison is valid and reliable.
Building up an implication ASSUMING that Balmer and Seaville Islands have the same size and well planned roads and streets, the author suggestS that the
redution REDUCTION in the number of accidents in Balmer would be the same AS observed in Seaville. According the argument
the , Balmer would have a reduction of 50% in the number of accidents by
a decreasing in the number of
mopes rent MOPED RENTALS BY
of 50%. But, IT IS QUITE POSSIBLE THAT
if Seaville
besides of decreasing DECREASED the number of rents
it also raised the fiscalization for mopes AND ALSO RAISED THE MOPED RENTAL RATES WHICH DISCOURAGED PEOPLE FROM RENTING THE MOPEDS.
As known, fining mopes which was faster than the speed allowed, and hiring more policemen to control the transit. Regardless of
wheather WHETHER the cities have
made ENACTED other measures to decreased accidents or not, the author does not efficiently show a connection between the expected decreased in the number of accidents in Balmer with the observed decrease
d in the LESSER number of accidents in Seaville.
To conclude, it is expected that the number of mopDe accidents decreased because of the reduction
of IN the number of
mopes MOPEDS circulating in the city. However, this author's argument is not likely significant ENOUGH TO persuade READERS that the decrease in accidents would be the same as observed in Seaville.