Book Reports /
Two scenes whose natures contribute to the theme of the play - Merchant of Venice Essay [12]
Two scenes are particularly
useful for highlighting the ambiguous nature of...
I wonder what the problem is... What does the prof say? When you have a prof that gives poor grades even to students who write well and try hard, doing well is often a matter of following advice and showing improvement, appreciation, and respect.
I am interested to know what the feedback was thats/he gave.
...rather than the law;
while the contract between Antonio and... ----> when you use a semi-colon, it hs to work like a period. You should have an independent clause on each side. I'm talking about this use of it, not semi-colons used in lists. I hope I am correct, and not misleading you.
Important: I don't see a clear thesis statement. I see what you say in the long sentence with the semi-colon, but in any essay that compares 2 things you should have one profound "zen master" sentence that makes a profound statement about both. As I look to the last paragraph to find out the main idea... I can't really find one... is it all about the contracts/covenants?
I probably told you this before, but I see it like this: What do you call it when you have rings inside of rings, like a dart board? That thesis sentence in para #1 ... oh, yes, it is all about the covenants.
I think you just need to use the important words.. for example:
antithesis, analogy... use those words that the prof uses. That is how to score well, showing that you are explicitly answering the prompt.
And the thesis should focus on covenants, right?
Two scenes are particularly useful for highlighting the Shakespeare's use of covenants
ambiguous nature of justice in the play:
I hope I am understanding correctly, and not doing more harm than good. I also suggest adding additional topic sentences at the front of paragraphs to use words like antithesis and analogy so the prof sees that they are being covered..
Good luck! Tell me about her/his specific criticisms! And make sure they give specific criticisms; otherwise, maybe they need to be challenged!