EF_Sean
Dec 21, 2008
Undergraduate / Princeton - Significant Person - my mentor Mr. Mehmet Yuksel [3]
The essay tells about a change, rather than showing a change. Also, the change itself isn't necessarily a good one. You say you had become selfish and competitive, but all you tell us to illustrate the point is that you wanted to be the best at what you did, hardly a a negative trait. Then, you say you became more selfless by not caring about the results of your actions, hardly a positive trait. I think maybe what you meant to say was that you initially wanted to be the best at everything so that you could look down on those around you, but that you eventually learned to do your best for its own sake. At any rate, if you want readers to view the change positively, you'll have to revise what you have along those sorts of lines.
As for Yuksel, his importance is limited to one sentence in the entire essay: "He had one-on-one talks with me about my problem and gave me invaluable tips on how to be indifferent of my status among people, which he claimed would make me among the loved within my peers." Given that he was a counselor, his actions hardly make him a heroic mentor -- he did exactly what he was supposed to do. And since you don't describe him, or tell us what advice he specifically gave you, or what follow up he did, it is not clear why you say that the essay will be about his influence on you. Really, you could cut him from the story completely and have a stronger essay. This is a problem is that the essay is supposed to be about him, so you will probably have to go back to the drawing board to get a good essay. Maybe you could start the essay with something wise that Yuksel said to you, and then talk about how that profound piece of advice allowed you to change your attitude? Just a thought.
The essay tells about a change, rather than showing a change. Also, the change itself isn't necessarily a good one. You say you had become selfish and competitive, but all you tell us to illustrate the point is that you wanted to be the best at what you did, hardly a a negative trait. Then, you say you became more selfless by not caring about the results of your actions, hardly a positive trait. I think maybe what you meant to say was that you initially wanted to be the best at everything so that you could look down on those around you, but that you eventually learned to do your best for its own sake. At any rate, if you want readers to view the change positively, you'll have to revise what you have along those sorts of lines.
As for Yuksel, his importance is limited to one sentence in the entire essay: "He had one-on-one talks with me about my problem and gave me invaluable tips on how to be indifferent of my status among people, which he claimed would make me among the loved within my peers." Given that he was a counselor, his actions hardly make him a heroic mentor -- he did exactly what he was supposed to do. And since you don't describe him, or tell us what advice he specifically gave you, or what follow up he did, it is not clear why you say that the essay will be about his influence on you. Really, you could cut him from the story completely and have a stronger essay. This is a problem is that the essay is supposed to be about him, so you will probably have to go back to the drawing board to get a good essay. Maybe you could start the essay with something wise that Yuksel said to you, and then talk about how that profound piece of advice allowed you to change your attitude? Just a thought.