Grammar, Usage / [the word talent and trend] - help regarding grammar! [4]

plz help me with these..

(1)is the word "talent" a noun or an adjective?

(2)playing jokes on April fools day is common in many regions although none knows how the tradition began.
the word in bold carries a mistake but i am not clear about it... whats that???

(3)noone but him could have told them that the thief was i.
the use of this word here is correct... which law of pronoun does this correspond to??

Writing Feedback / THE DIVINE MAGIC WAND; Beliefs and thoughts [4]

PLEASE... i want a lengthy correction for that plus the concept that can be drawn out from this piece of writing.. how good the concept was. thanks!

Drowning people, so much handicapped in their beliefs by just a few experiences of failure...!
Cocksure people, too much certain about what they reckon...!
Rather, vague people, oblivious of something that can always matter...!
Oblivious of the divine hand. the invisible magic wand..!!!

Beliefs and thoughts; both can be self-created. Both can be taken in any direction. Both can be understood in a several different conceptions' but still' out of these all' only one of them.. only one of these directions is the right one. Stressfully, only one. Man has been created studded with faults and mistaken perceptions, and the probability of their being wrong is always yet higher. And those who ultimately get the right way to think; are bestowed with the ability to skim through life and see the original picture behind this uncertain surface of life! we call that sufism!

With an inbuilt instinctive rumination, I came to the conclusion that we all are yet living in our immature world of thoughts. We think just what we want. We perceive just equal to our abilities to think. But I can tell everyone of a refuge from this immaturity. Because, we all think immaturely about future. We are most often utterly disappointed by the actuality. If we want to avoid such disappointments, we have to think perfectly. Nobody can obviously do that. So why not to look for an alternative? Why not go to the door of the one who knows everything and who is perfect...!! YES, why not just put our effort and leave all the consequences to be dealt by the divine magic wand! Why not find our peace in prayers rather than the rotten music? Why not pray, believe and trust the hand that is always perfect? Why not... just why not trust in this vivid refuge!!

Research Papers / "theory of natural selection" and "theory of special creation" RESEARCH ANALYSIS [3]

The modern theory in which most of the people believe is the modern concept of "Neo-Darwinism". The world has moved into the rather refined concepts of evolution and the progress of life on all spheres of land and environment. Most of the people who claim to know, know not more than that it was Darwin who referred the early stages of the development of man as the monkey kind. One must not blame Darwin for even if he is proved wrong in the later years, but best credit goes to him to open up a world of thought and consideration where many thoughtful ones were compelled to think about the world in a rather different way. He is the father of this thought provoking evolutionary theory.

People mostly fail to get convinced on his point because in fact no traces of fossils exist which can prove the evolutionary stages between man and monkey but yet there is another thing to think about. It is his theory of natural selection that is the basis of the today's knowledge about the most believed conception of "survival of the fittest".Here his theory with all kinds of comparative evidences, paleontology and molecular biology is combined with Mendel's proposals proving as the theory called "Neo-Darwinism". Of course Mendel was the one who formulated laws in biology which is not common, for, surprisingly, there are only two laws in biology due to the complex nature of life. and Darwin is still unable to make the theory as effective and attractive to boost it up as a law.

Of course this means there are a number of points besides natural selection that his theory contains and are a cause of utter disapproval. These points failed due to the lack of supportive evidences. Here the "theory of special creation" prominently stands out among all. We all believe in ADAM as the first man who descended down from heavens. Was he a case of special creation? yes that can be approved and Darwin is again proved wrong. So here it must be concluded that Darwin was true in the sense of similar evolving species and that which again cannot be applicable to all. This is the deviating nature of life where laws by Mendel and Hardy-Weinberg seem to be a great success.