Writing Feedback /
Death penalty or a life in prison for murderers? [4]
Do not say WELL PROMINENT. Prominent is not the kind of word that goes with "well."
The question that whether or not our society should pursue death penalty is currently
well prominent among activists.
From my perspective, each side of the argument has their own reasons and
this issue still needs more careful scrutiny in order to be assessed adequately. It is better if you take a stand a choose a side. At the end of the first paragraph, tell whether you agree or not. :-)
On one hand, modern
philanthropists (Choose a different word. A philanthropist is one who donates money.) all over the world are denouncing death penalty as a cruel and brutal punishment.
They argue that when criminals actually committed to a crime, it is essential for judges to consider all the reasons behind the act.
As a matter of fact, in most cases of homicide, the murderer is just a
certain consequence product of all of his surrounding factors, including poor education,
maintaining poverty, or even family pressure.
On the other hand, the majority of our society approve of the death penalty and believe it is an effective way to curb ...
In conclusion, my opinion is that death penalty seems to be more reasonable and appropriate. In particular, in countries where criminals are plentiful, this approach is able to provide a useful tool to help settle the circumstance.---In the United States, we use the death penalty, but we also have a high rate of capital crime. For that reason, maybe we should think again about how effective the death penalty is for reducing capital crime.
Okay, most importantly, add your argument to the end of the first paragraph. You should also give some discussion to show WHY you argue in favor of it. You gave arguments fro both sides. Why are the arguments in favor of the death penalty stronger?
:-) Great job!!